Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Dual Citizenship (according to his defenders!)
Factcheck.org ^ | August 29, 2008 | Joe Miller

Posted on 10/14/2008 8:19:20 AM PDT by Stingray

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: mouse1
Obviously, something is wrong or bho would just produce a b.c. for the courts to prove Berg wrong and then go on tv claiming the evil republicans were behind it.

I think he's waiting for McCain or Palin to bring it up. Then he'll produce the COLB and make them look like fools. It's a trap and Berg isn't big enough game for them to spring it.

62 posted on 10/14/2008 10:45:10 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Or he can follow your inexpensive path - have it thrown out on technical grounds. That's what he's doing.

You have to be kidding if you think fighting a technical legal battle is the inexpensive route when compared to producing a document. I said it was in expensive when compared to potentially taking a case to SCOTUS.

You and Berg and a bunch of others have called him a liar.

Do not put words in my mouth. I have never said any such thing. Go back and reread my post. I said that Berg made some interesting points which could be easily refuted by BHO. The fact that he does not do so weakens his case and gives credibility to Berg.

63 posted on 10/14/2008 10:46:26 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
SO, how reliable is Ed Hale? ....Am also anxiouly waiting to see if this boat floats.....

No idea, some blogger. But if he's got documents and they're genuine then it doesn't matter who Ed Hale is. Obama would have some 'splaining to do.

64 posted on 10/14/2008 12:21:56 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Thanks for the clarification. I may not have used the preferred term, but we agree on the principle: Obama can easily prove he was born in Hawaii, if he was in fact born in Hawaii.
The fact that he chooses not to do this calls into question the validity of his position.


Agreed. Though, it may be something as simple as he doesn't want the public to see that his Birth Certificate shows his religious affiliation (thanks to his Dad) as being "Muslim."
65 posted on 10/14/2008 12:23:12 PM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
You have to be kidding if you think fighting a technical legal battle is the inexpensive route when compared to producing a document. I said it was in expensive when compared to potentially taking a case to SCOTUS.

And you've got to be kidding if you think Obama and the DNC care how much this is costing. Not with hundreds of millions in campaign donations. They'll spend whatever it takes to discredit the charges and get them thrown out.

Do not put words in my mouth. I have never said any such thing. Go back and reread my post. I said that Berg made some interesting points which could be easily refuted by BHO.

And why would he have to refute them, unless you thought he was lying?

66 posted on 10/14/2008 12:25:14 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

There was a post on a thread this week end, Ityped in address I took from it’s paper copy and apparently it has been pulled......

On it Hale says: All Phill Berg want(sic) is to have a court hearing and he will introduce that Kenya BD> I have a copy of that BC but will not post it till I am cleared by Phil.
...He further state the three people risked their lives to get them ...that they are in hiding for their own security....Today I am the proudest American alive.


67 posted on 10/14/2008 12:36:54 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Acorn, Africa,Alinsky, Ayers,....BroadwayBank,Bastard child,Birthcert......now to the "C"s ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
On it Hale says: All Phill Berg want(sic) is to have a court hearing and he will introduce that Kenya BD> I have a copy of that BC but will not post it till I am cleared by Phil. ...He further state the three people risked their lives to get them ...that they are in hiding for their own security....Today I am the proudest American alive.

Sounds fishy to me. If he has something and produces it then he'll have media swarming around him like flies on poop. He'll own Fox. Limbaugh will get Paul Shanklin to sing songs of praise to him. Coulter will throw herself on him. McCain will campaign with him. If only he has something...

68 posted on 10/14/2008 1:43:42 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Obama may not be willing to deliver “that” Birth Certificate to the Judge because presenting a document into evidence in a Federal Court proceeding requires that such a document is sworn to the Court by the lawyers (officers of the court) and the plaintiff/defendant that the document is a true original in its intended purpose...

If it can be proved after being entered into evidence in the Federal proceedings that the document was a known fraud or a fake, or that Obama's mother, knowing that he was born in Kenya, then traveled to the USA and filed a false statement of birth that was used to generate the BC so that he could be an American citizen, that's a very big problem for him. A problem that now puts the lawyers and the Defendant (Obama)at risk of Federal jail time... You just don't play with this stuff because Federal judges have little patience with and a lot of power over such actions... which may explain why they are fighting so hard to avoid being forced by discovery in the case to deliver Obama’s true and original Birth Certificate.

If they deliver a US Birth Certificate and then “another” Birth Certificate (or equivalent document) shows up in Kenya, indicating that he was really born there, and they presented a document contrary to that finding, the resulting problem is just not political, its criminal.

69 posted on 10/14/2008 2:13:13 PM PDT by SterlingSilver (If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck... its a duck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You're turning back arguments towards me, instead of answering the questions directly, is a predictable and tiresome response.

As to your first point, the costs? The costs of losing far exceed any dollar amount that could be reasonably expected to come out of the litigation. I have said it before and will say it again:

The quickest, cheapest way to be rid of this case is to prove the man wrong. They are not doing so. That troubles me, as it should any reasonable person.

And why would he have to refute them, unless you thought he was lying?

Again you are putting words into my mouth, words that were never there. It seems an exercise in futility to explain the same thing a third time, so I will state something more succinctly and not take a barb at your misdirected question:

I do not know where Barrack was born, neither do you. A man has filed a lawsuit claiming barrack was not born in Hawaii. Barrack has not provided evidence to prove him wrong. That troubles me and gives credence to the man's claim.

70 posted on 10/14/2008 2:21:43 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg
it may be something as simple as he doesn't want the public to see ... his religious affiliation (thanks to his Dad) as being "Muslim."

Good point.

71 posted on 10/14/2008 2:23:59 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SterlingSilver
Very good points. If they are indeed applicable to the facts in this case, as we now know them, they would give credence to the validity of Mr. Berg's complaint.

The longer this is unaddressed by Obama the more dubious I become of the true circumstances of his birth.

72 posted on 10/14/2008 2:29:36 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg
Though, it may be something as simple as he doesn't want the public to see that his Birth Certificate shows his religious affiliation (thanks to his Dad) as being "Muslim."

The examples of long form Hawaiian birth certicates that have been posted don't have a blank for religion.


73 posted on 10/14/2008 2:30:42 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
The quickest, cheapest way to be rid of this case is to prove the man wrong. They are not doing so. That troubles me, as it should any reasonable person.

Quick and easy is not their goal. Their objective is to have the charges discredited. To have Berg's lawsuit thrown out as being totally without merit. To keep him from having any sort of day in court. For Obama to just whip out a birth certificate, when there is no legal reason requiring him to do so and when no other presidential candidate has had to do so, would give Berg credibility they don't want to give him and that they don't think he deserves. So money and easy isn't their motiviation, politics is. That's why they'll fight as long as hard as it takes to get the case tossed out, and will produce documents only when required to do so by the court.

74 posted on 10/14/2008 2:54:37 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
DO you know how Berg is going to get this information before the court? If he waits till after the election, won't it cause a constitutional crisis?
75 posted on 10/14/2008 3:26:31 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Acorn, Africa,Alinsky, Ayers,....BroadwayBank,Bastard child,Birthcert......now to the "C"s ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
DO you know how Berg is going to get this information before the court?

No idea. If he waits till after the election, won't it cause a constitutional crisis?

Assuming Obama wins and if it turns out he wasn't born in the U.S.? Sure will, but there is no possible outcome except Obama being removed from office.

76 posted on 10/14/2008 3:29:09 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Sure will, but there is no possible outcome except Obama being removed from office.

Actually there might be potential criminal charges for fraud.

Impeachment would not be a likely, as he would immediately resign. Since the fraud occurred prior to his becoming President, simple removal from office would not be the sole remedy.

Of course, Biden would pardon him and then he would suffer the fate of Gerald R. Ford and not be reelected.

77 posted on 10/14/2008 3:41:24 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Sure will, but there is no possible outcome except Obama being removed from office.

With a super majority dim congress I wouldn't bet on that.

78 posted on 10/14/2008 3:50:40 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
With a super majority dim congress I wouldn't bet on that.

Congress wouldn't have a say in the matter. If Obama is shown to be Constitutionally ineligible to be president then there won't be an impeachment. He would lose the office and the courts would make sure of it.

79 posted on 10/14/2008 5:08:40 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Actually there might be potential criminal charges for fraud.

What happens after he is removed from office is interesting to speculate on, but doesn't change the fact that if Obama doesn't meet the Constitutional requirements for president then he's out, period.

80 posted on 10/14/2008 5:10:35 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson