Posted on 10/16/2008 8:07:15 AM PDT by steve-b
Kevin Heron, you get an F.
Joe was not posited as an expert in any field...
See, Obama citing the US Chamber of Commerce (and they don’t often support Democrats!)
John McCain did not appeal to Joseph Wurzelbacher as "an expert" on economic policy, but as an example of an American affected by specific economic policies.
Anne Nester is no Richard Weaver.
Hence what's wrong with our education system. 'Joe the Plumber' was an appeal to emotion, not to authority; but Heron obviously just saw a box to check and so he did.
So basically, this school has the lowest level of indoctinators filling the childrens head with crap.
No indication of which candidate is using class warfare, naturally.
Kiehl clearly knows nothing of logic.
Exactly. Young Mr. Heron was obviously not paying attention in Critical Thinking class. Joe the Plumber was never meant to be an “expert,” but rather a plain old vanilla example of a real, honest-to-goodness, working American who understands that Obama wants to take his money and give it to somebody else. McCain’s only failure on this issue was not saying the rest of the truth: “Obama wants to spread your hard-earned wealth around by giving it to those who already pay no taxes. He proposes to create a brand new and mammoth welfare system funded by you, Joe.”
MM
Joe the plumber was none of the above. He was an evidentiary example. A data point. The principal potential fallacy is a fallacy of composition,the assumption that Joe the plumber is a representative member of a larger class of individuals who would be so injured. But demonstrating that it is a fallacy requires demonstrating that others would not be so injured.
Joe the Plumber is not an economic expert in a college sense, but he has more common sense real-world experience than the entire university system, and unlike all liberal elites in our colleges, Joe “gets it!”
If Joe isn't qualified to say how Obama's tax proposal would affect his personal situation and business plans, who is?
Some useful websites for our college students:
nonindoctrination.com
neverfindout.org
I don’t understand how the statement you quoted matches your statement. A dysphemism is substituting a favorable expression for an unfavorable one.
In reality, Obama and the Marxists want to take the hard-earned wealth and feed it to a corrupt entrenched Washington bureaucracy and have the rest of us scrambling and begging favor with them to get the small percentage that the bureaucrats do not consume.
Money is power and power is what they want.
Joe’s situation is evidence of the effect O’s tax policy would have on small business.
Joe is clearly an expert on his own situation. However, Joe is not an expert in tax policy, per se.
Sorry , that’s
NoIndoctrination.org
I wasn’t referencing that one particular fallacy. The point was the adjunct and the associate prof are hacks. The article doesn’t ever reference what the statement was, but the “teacher” has to help the students with running commentary about what She thinks about class warfare. Any guesses as to which candidate she was responding to? I’ll bet it wasn’t BO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.