Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamReading
Wilson rejected American occupation of any part of the Middle East.

Obama has the Wilsonian worldview ~ which is why he'd get us in a huge war. "W" has no Wilsonian illusions.

This former editor at National Review is clearly senile.

17 posted on 11/03/2008 11:01:45 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
Wilson rejected American occupation of any part of the Middle East.

The Near East was a lot further away in those days, and the British and French were only too happy to assume control, with Wilson's blessing.

Wilson said "We intend to teach the Mexicans to elect good men," and that's the attitude Hart is talking about.

Obama has the Wilsonian worldview ~ which is why he'd get us in a huge war.

That's certainly possible. Hart is wrong about Obama.

"W" has no Wilsonian illusions.

If "W" is George W. Bush, and "Wilsonian" means "interventionist" or "world bettering", of course he does and did. Denying it now is pointless.

This former editor at National Review is clearly senile.

We can disagree with him about Obama without going nuclear on him.

61 posted on 11/03/2008 1:51:05 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson