Reading through the gahrrrbageeee....
It appears this person celebrates the portent of an Obama presidency as once again having a “thinking man” in the White House.
What is it with these educated idiots?
One only needs to see the writer’s identification as “professor” to know that this is someone who has absolutely no respect for the common man/woman point of view, rather they have utter contempt for the masses.
There is a certain sort of academic conservative who embraces the Platonic ideal of the pholosopher-king as President. I have never understood it: the philosopher makes a much better legislator than an executive. Consider, for example, Daniel Moynihan or S.I Hayakawa. The Presidency demands a form of decisiveness that would be uncommon in an intellectual.
Bill Ayers is considered a "thinking man" because a left wing indoctrination center hired him because of his radical views.
Should a domestic terrorist like Ayers become our president as well?
The author of this article is obviously NOT a thinking man himself.