Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Favors Two-Step Stimulus, Seeks Permanent Tax Cut in 2009
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 11/06/2008 1:23:09 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Pelosi Favors Two-Step Stimulus, Seeks Permanent Tax Cut in 2009 By GREG HITT

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told the Wall Street Journal that she is considering a two-staged effort to boost the shaky U.S. economy, arguing for action now on a stimulus package of $60 billion to $100 billion, followed early next year by a companion measure that would include a "permanent tax cut."

In an interview Thursday morning, the California Democrat pointed to weakness in the nation's jobs market, and urged the White House, long skeptical of Democratic-led stimulus efforts, to work with Congress in the waning days of President Bush's term.

"Let's see if we can't do something, working together now, that gives us a two month jump," she said. She said any measure enacted in a lame-duck session of Congress this month would effectively be a downpayment on additional measures enacted later. "We'll take the longer view as soon as we take over in January."

Ms. Pelosi said she doesn't favor a capital gains tax cut, as pushed by congressional Republicans. But she did say the "second piece" of the Democratic stimulus agenda should include a tax cut.

The speaker said she prefers a direct tax cut over tax rebate like the one pushed by President George W. Bush a year ago. The speaker said a direct tax cut can have a more immediate impact on the economy, especially if the government adjusts tax withholding tables to speed dollars into worker paychecks. "The impact is faster than a rebate, which takes a few months to get into people's hands," she said in the interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho2008; obamatransitionfile; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
Did I just read what I just read?
1 posted on 11/06/2008 1:23:09 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Never make a deal with the devil, always turns out poorly.


2 posted on 11/06/2008 1:24:19 PM PST by Fred (The Democrat Party is the Nadir of Nihilism and Obummer is a WHINING marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

When pigs fly


3 posted on 11/06/2008 1:24:41 PM PST by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Considering the source of the statements, I don’t believe it...


4 posted on 11/06/2008 1:25:06 PM PST by Dubh_Ghlase (Barack and roll hoochie-Koo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
include a "permanent tax cut."

I call BS. No way any of the socialists are going to cut taxes.

5 posted on 11/06/2008 1:25:10 PM PST by Domandred (Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

don’t believe it Please.


6 posted on 11/06/2008 1:25:32 PM PST by Perdogg (01-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We now live in bizarro world. We’ve spent the last 5 or 6 years listening to the looney left demanding that we roll back the Bush tax cuts. WTF???


7 posted on 11/06/2008 1:26:14 PM PST by rivercat (Draft Newt for RNC Chairman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She has to let capitalism work for a little before switching to socialism.


8 posted on 11/06/2008 1:26:18 PM PST by BGHater (The GOP, the new DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why not just extend the Bush tax cuts?????? There’s a catch her somewhere. These are Democrats after all.


9 posted on 11/06/2008 1:26:26 PM PST by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Goldman Sachs, which is getting $10 billion from the bailout plan, is paying out $6.85 billion in bonuses, according to media reports. That's $210,000 per employee. And that's despite a 47% drop in its profit and 53% drop in its share price.

Morgan Stanley, which is also getting $10 billion from our government, is doling out $6.44 billion in bonuses or $138,700 per employee, even though its profits tumbled 41% and its shares are off by 69%. And even the failures at Lehman Brothers are collectively getting over $1 billion in bonuses.

NEW YORK, Nov 6 (Reuters) - Merrill Lynch & Co (MER.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) Chief Executive John Thain may receive a $5.22 million award if Bank of America Corp (BAC.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) completes its purchase of the Wall Street bank and brokerage by Dec. 31 as planned.

The sum, known as a change-of-control award, reflects the cash value of stock-based awards that would vest automatically when the merger closes, Bank of America said. Merrill Chief Financial Officer Nelson Chai would get a $1.17 million award, the bank said.

Bank of America disclosed the awards this week in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing. It disclosed awards of slightly different sums in two separate filings last month.

10 posted on 11/06/2008 1:26:47 PM PST by Afronaut (It's 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Did I just read what I just read?

Translation: Tax increases on whatever demographic that will not lose them votes to pay for welfare checks to indolent scum.

11 posted on 11/06/2008 1:27:16 PM PST by Stentor (b. July 4, 1776 - d. January 20, 2009 sorely missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

In other words, she’ll gladly pay us tomorrow for a two-step stimulus package today.


12 posted on 11/06/2008 1:27:16 PM PST by skeeter (Its Barry's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I guess it means that deep down all liberals know that supply and demand is what it’s all about.

Wealth only comes by enterprise; people spending their own money.

But it takes this downturn to flush ‘em out - and they will revert to type when the downturn is over and live in fantasy land forevermore.


13 posted on 11/06/2008 1:27:37 PM PST by vimto (To do the right thing you don't have to be intelligent - you have to be brave (Sasz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

“’Scuse me Ma’am, but there’s a new sheriff in town...”


14 posted on 11/06/2008 1:27:42 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Afronaut

It looks like we won after all?


15 posted on 11/06/2008 1:27:52 PM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

But are they going to pull a bait and switch by letting the Bush tax cuts expire and then give us tax cuts that are smaller?


16 posted on 11/06/2008 1:28:07 PM PST by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Is it my imagination or is the Wall Street Journal moving hard left. I thought it would go the other way or at least stabilize after the Murdoch takeover.
17 posted on 11/06/2008 1:28:38 PM PST by Alcibiades ("First come smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire"--Roland Deschain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

This is an attempt to bring “us” 55 million voters in.


18 posted on 11/06/2008 1:28:39 PM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Danette

The catch is that, after looking at the budget real hard for a solid 5 minutes, the Lord Messiah Barack Obama will conclude that we can’t afford tax cuts after all. The stimulus welfare check is all we’ll see.

1993 Redux.


19 posted on 11/06/2008 1:28:39 PM PST by Thane_Banquo (President George W. Bush, RINO-in-Chief.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, she’ll cut taxes for gays. Or, maybe some other underprivileged group.


20 posted on 11/06/2008 1:28:58 PM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson