Perhaps. But I believe a stronger message would be sent should Michael Steele be the face of Republican dissent in America. Gingrich and Thompson can assist, but Steele should be the spearhead.
I agree. As I’ve already said ... Steele should be the head of the RNC. Steele has a bully pulpit to talk from and be reported in the Press.
Newt and Fred have supporting roles getting to the people. Keep the message on the ‘AIR’ at all times.
But I believe a stronger message would be sent should Michael Steele be the face of Republican dissent in America.
The question I have is Steele that type person? A in your face, in the media type, or is he a behind the scenes type person. Right now I think we need someone who will be out front on tv, in the papers, speaking at as many events as posible, etc to keep the GOP focused. The Party Chair doesn’t have to be the one to be nominated in 12 or 16 but rather the one to keep the party focused and before the public.