Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOIA docs show feds can lojack mobiles without telco help
ars technica ^ | November 16, 2008 | Julian Sanchez

Posted on 11/17/2008 6:09:50 PM PST by mad_as_he$$

Courts in recent years have been raising the evidentiary bar law enforcement agents must meet in order to obtain historical cell phone records that reveal information about a target's location. But documents obtained by civil liberties groups under a Freedom of Information Act request suggest that "triggerfish" technology can be used to pinpoint cell phones without involving cell phone providers at all.

(Excerpt) Read more at arstechnica.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: calea; cell; feds; foia; geocaching; lojack; lp; privacy; triggerfish
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2008 6:09:51 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
This has been known at least since the publication of "Killing Pablo", which detailed how they tracked Colombian drug kingpin Pablo Escobar via his cell phone.

Your phone lets the nearest cell tower know it's there by responding to a "ping" from the tower. It will also respond to pinging from other equipment -- which can then triangulate on the location of the phone.

2 posted on 11/17/2008 6:15:31 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Question O-thority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
Yes, the big thing is that I believe most “citizens” think it takes a court order for the feds to do that. Wonder how many would be surprised to find out they can do it anytime they want.
3 posted on 11/17/2008 6:18:11 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

So the crooks can just remove the battery and avoid this?


4 posted on 11/17/2008 6:21:46 PM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP
Yes, the preferred method is a throw away.
5 posted on 11/17/2008 6:23:16 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Actually, although the criminal usage is a problem, I don’t think that was the gist of what the poster was trying to say.

They can do this to ANYONE, can track ANY citizen through their cell phones, ANY time they want.

How many people carry them with them everywhere? How many can’t seem to live without them?

It’ll be easy for the government to keep track of their subjects...I mean, the people.


6 posted on 11/17/2008 6:27:41 PM PST by hoagy62 (PAGF Charter member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

May be of interest.

I doubt such technology is terribly useful against wanted criminals. Only a total idiot would carry around a cell phone that is directly associated with them, while trying to avoid law enforcement.

I suppose one of those ‘throw away’ cell phones would be the way to go for someone looking to avoid being tracked.


7 posted on 11/17/2008 6:31:20 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62

Exactly.


8 posted on 11/17/2008 6:38:04 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Are they monitoring you?
9 posted on 11/17/2008 6:38:44 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
" Are they monitoring you?"

No, they seem to be pleased by only taking money from my paycheck.

10 posted on 11/17/2008 6:42:50 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
This is starting to sound like a tin-foil hat discussion. Sure, they could track someone by their cell phone with lots of expensive gear, a dozen or so well-trained agents... But so what? I mean, they could just get one guy to follow most anyone and the subject would never know. How many people are trained on spotting and eluding a tail?

The real question is why would anyone bother? I have a relative, borderline certifiable IMHO, who at one time firmly believed that she was being actively tracked. It was all I could do to keep from laughing out loud at the suggestion. She, like so many of us, is really a nobody. Go ahead, bug my phone, my house, my car. Warning, I sing (when I'm alone) in the car - badly. Look at any of the so-called reality-based shows polluting the airwaves. TV production companies have to work hard at making "reality" even mildly interesting. Anyone tracking me, I'd probably drive them to drink inside a week.

The upshot is, if someone with enough resources wants to track you, they're going to track you. There's not a heck of a lot you can do about it without living a completely bizarre lifestyle. A little paranoia is good, but this seems to be close-to or over the edge. I refuse to fear my cell phone, car, or anything else. I won't live in a "State of Fear."

11 posted on 11/17/2008 6:48:17 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar
I think you're missing the point, imho, it's not about “fear” per se, but it's about the very real technology and what is indeed possible.
12 posted on 11/17/2008 7:09:39 PM PST by khnyny ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
lol sad but true. Point is no one knows if they are monitoring your cell phone or PDA.
13 posted on 11/17/2008 7:23:40 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

So, your phone answers the ping even if it’s turned off? The only way to avoid the ping is to remove the battery? (no, I’m not getting fitted for a tin-foil hat, just researching the issue)


14 posted on 11/17/2008 7:24:24 PM PST by blu (Last one out of Michigan, please turn off the lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: khnyny
Ok, I got off on a bit of a tangent. What I was trying to convey is what's the big deal about that technology - cell phone tracking - when there are already so many other technologies that make it possible to track someone?

If you drive an On-Star equipped vehicle.

If you have LoJack anti-theft protection.

If you have a ez-pass toll-road (or equivalent) tag on your car.

Any RFID tags on your clothes or any items around you.

Your company badge, drivers license, etc. may have an RFID tag in it. eg. if you can wave your badge in front of a reader panel - that's RFID.

In an urban setting via any number of surveillance cameras.

Good old fashioned tail.

Really, once you become a "person of interest" you're going to be tracked. Heck, just taking excessive steps not to be tracked may make you a person of interest - as in "what is he/she hiding?"

I guess my feeling is, sure, the technology could be used to track you, but it is no big deal when there are sooo many other ways to keep an eye on someone. And that's not even getting into the fancy stuff like aerial surveillance, chemical tagging agents, bugging, wire-tapping, internet monitoring, etc.

15 posted on 11/17/2008 7:36:09 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Batman does it.


16 posted on 11/17/2008 8:20:08 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

****Ok, I got off on a bit of a tangent. What I was trying to convey is what’s the big deal****

Whats the big deal?

How is that attitude helpful to a roomful of patriots that are trying to arm themselves with the knowledge that it will take to be prepared in the coming years?

How are you helping this community prepare for a future that will need input like this to help it avoid unnecessary interference from a possibly hostile government?


17 posted on 11/17/2008 8:25:18 PM PST by ResponseAbility (Government tends to never fix the problems it creates in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ResponseAbility
By pointing out that the war against unwarranted surveillance is already lost - that there are already numerous means to track someone. That while being aware of this particular technique is fine, we shouldn't fret over it or waste too much time/energy worrying about it. It is inherent in the design of the cell phone system. It cannot be removed or defeated (except by not having a cell phone of any kind), and any laws against its use could be creatively ignored just as easily as any others. If you are worried about a hostile government infringing on our rights, there are far better ways to spend your time and energy.
18 posted on 11/17/2008 8:44:31 PM PST by CodeMasterPhilzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KoRn; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
19 posted on 11/17/2008 9:39:38 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

Is it true that my passport or drivers licence will be invalidated if the RFID chip is disabled?


20 posted on 11/17/2008 9:45:12 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Obama/Biden...change you can laugh at!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson