Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questioning Authorities: Lawrence Resident Interviews Kennedy Assassination Witness for Book
Lawrence Journal World ^ | http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2008/nov/22/questioning-authorities-lawrence-resident-intervie/ | By Terry Rombeck

Posted on 11/24/2008 11:07:50 AM PST by lewisglad

Edwards, a Lawrence resident and former Lawrence police officer, has co-authored a book telling the story of one of those eyewitnesses. The publication coincides with the anniversary of Kennedy’s assassination, which occurred 45 years ago today in Dallas.

“Beyond the Fence Line,” which he wrote with Marysville teacher Casey J. Quinlan, is about Ed Hoffman, who cannot hear or speak and whose accounts were largely ignored for years because of his difficulty communicating.

Now, his story is told in detail in a 233-page book that includes many diagrams explaining his experience. Though he’s told his story through shorter publications and has presented at the annual conference on the assassination sponsored by JFK Lancer Productions and Publications, an organization that supports alternative theories to the assassination that also published the book, this is the first in-depth look at his experience.

“It is a wonderful feeling,” Hoffman says via e-mail. “I have been to the conference almost every year and have been able to tell my story, but I have often worried that when I am gone, the story will no longer be available for those interested. I now have it in print, and it will always be available for anyone to read and/or study.”

The incident

Edwards, who now works in security for Nebraska Furniture Mart in Kansas City, Kan., first met Hoffman almost 20 years ago after Hoffman’s story began circulating. Edwards has published several papers regarding the Kennedy assassination and was looking to do more research.

Hoffman’s story is this, according to Edwards:

Hoffman broke a tooth while working at his job at Texas Instruments in Dallas. While driving to his dentist, he stopped in the Dealey Plaza area to watch the president’s motorcade drive by.

He stood on a bridge near the plaza and saw a pair of men talking by a railroad switchbox.

He saw a man in a business suit and fedora raise a rifle, saw a puff of smoke and ran down a fence line. The shooter stopped and tossed the rifle to another man, who took the weapon apart, put it in a canvas bag and walked away.

A few seconds later, Hoffman saw the president’s motorcade drive by, with obvious wounds to Kennedy’s head.

Hoffman attempted to tell several police officers — including his uncle, who was on the force — about what he saw, but his inability to talk and hear made it difficult.

Also, his family wanted to protect him from scrutiny or physical danger. After all, the government concluded that Oswald acted alone in the assassination, and the case was closed.

Unusual book

Debra Conway, president of JFK Lancer Productions and Publications (“Lancer” was the Secret Service’s code name for Kennedy), says “Beyond the Fence Line” is rare in that it focuses entirely on one witness’ account.

“Typically in a book about witnesses, every chapter will have a different witness,” she says. “Whether we want to believe it or not, originally the witnesses were, and still are, very fearful about talking about what they had seen.”

Conway, who lives in a Dallas suburb, says she realizes some people view “conspiracy theorists” as being crazy.

“It’s hard,” she says. “And I always say I wear my tinfoil hat with pride. You have to get past that and wear it with pride. There are reporters (and) there are professional historians who won’t get near this case.”

The Internet, she says, has made it easier for anyone with a theory to publish his or her thoughts. But she says Edwards and Quinlan have done their homework.

“These authors did a tremendous job,” she says.

A story told

Edwards says Hoffman is a “sincere man” and that the details in his story can be corroborated by other witness accounts from Nov. 22, 1963. Much of the book is spent explaining those connections.

Edwards believes as many as a dozen potential shooters were at the site to kill Kennedy that day.

But he’s not confident the entire truth will ever be uncovered.

“I hate to use the cliché that it’s the crime of the century,” he says. “It’s killing the president in broad daylight, with hundreds and hundreds of witnesses. And the government seemed to brush it under the carpet.”

For his part, Hoffman says he’s always been angered that more people didn’t listen to his story, even 45 years later.

“It has always been frustrating to me that my story wasn’t taken more seriously. From the first few hours following the assassination, no one took me seriously,” he says. “I knew I had valuable information and tried in every way to tell those who needed to know.”

Now, the memories are as vivid as they were back then, he says.

“I am sure that Lee Harvey Oswald was not the lone assassin that day,” he says. “Without a doubt.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 11/24/2008 11:07:50 AM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Did anyone see the Oliver Stone film on 11.22, JFK? He blew the lone gunman theory to shreds.


2 posted on 11/24/2008 11:10:20 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
More Kennedy BS. In the Venona Tapes the KGB claims their two biggest successes were (1) Rendering J. Edgar Hoover an histroical laughing stock and (2) creating doubt that JFK was murdered by a lone Marxist, Lee Harvey Oswald.

Everytime someone pays attention to one of these nonsense books...the KGB laughs.

3 posted on 11/24/2008 11:14:53 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

“Puff of smoke”? Were they using black powder??


4 posted on 11/24/2008 11:15:50 AM PST by xlib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xlib

It was apparently used to create a diversion, so the other shooter(s) could complete their assignment. Just reporting what I’ve read/heard.


5 posted on 11/24/2008 11:18:04 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
After extensive reading over the years, my take is that it was a mob contract hit. There were enough motives. Oswald was a perfect patsy. And the mob how to keep it quiet.

Their other political assassination, Jimmy Hoffa is still unsolved.

6 posted on 11/24/2008 11:19:48 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
Saw it. It has been debunked as a fantastic fiction.

The "witness" in your post claims a shot was fired from the front of the vehicle, perhaps the fatal head shot. Question: where did the bullet go?

Fact for your researches: the bullet from the fatal head shot was found in the limo. Where? And does that location, and other damage it did to the car, favor the "official" account or that of this "witness"?

7 posted on 11/24/2008 11:21:17 AM PST by ExGeeEye (The biggest disadvantage in America today is not fitting into any particular victim group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

It will be interesting to read the book, appearently this guy is an ex-cop and didn’t say anything for years.


8 posted on 11/24/2008 11:21:27 AM PST by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

—bflr—


9 posted on 11/24/2008 11:24:52 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

JFK was a movie with little basis in fact other than it was barely entertaining.


10 posted on 11/24/2008 11:25:10 AM PST by Pistolshot ("Democrats don't show respect, they just demand respect " - ClearCase_guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

I’m still wondering his Oswald fired off so many shots in so few seconds.


11 posted on 11/24/2008 11:27:22 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
“anyone see the Oliver Stone film on 11.22, JFK? He blew the lone gunman theory to shreds.”

excuse me...please tell me you are “J/K” LOL

Stone's fiction had more holes than a colander.

As a Marine Corps Viet Nam combat veteran, I too thought for many years that there was more than one shooter BUT I have come to the conclusion that Oswald's plan was being at the right place, the lone shooter and JFK being there at the wrong time; Oswald was successful in his assassination attempt of JFK...And Jack Ruby just happened to be in the right place at the right time. Now that's not to say that there weren't others who wanted JFK dead but Oswald was the lone shooter and Ruby was the lone shooter...no conspiracies.

12 posted on 11/24/2008 11:28:38 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

You’re a spiritual being having a human experience.???? If you believe in Oliver Stone, you must also be wearing love beads, painting your face, and wearing tie-dye.


13 posted on 11/24/2008 11:29:11 AM PST by Doc Savage ("Are you saying Jesus can't hit a curve ball? - Harris to Cerrano - Major League)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
“Whether we want to believe it or not, originally the witnesses were, and still are, very fearful about talking about what they had seen.”

That's why one cannot pry theses "witnesses " away from ANY TV interview or documentary that cleverly conceals their identity by openly posting their names and photos for their "pursuers"

BARF!!!!
14 posted on 11/24/2008 11:38:36 AM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

“Did anyone see the Oliver Stone film on 11.22, JFK? He blew the lone gunman theory to shreds.”

Stone invented facts, events and characters. He blew nothing to shreds but the reputations of the actors in the movie.


15 posted on 11/24/2008 11:41:37 AM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
Let's see. In my safe is a fairly pristine Mannilicher-Carcano similar to Oswalds. After exercising the bolt about 30 times the action is smoother than some of my Winchester pre-64 model 70's.

Coupled with the 6.5 Carcano cartridge this little puppy is accurate,with low recoil, quick handling, and superb for followup shots, and powerful enough for anything up to whitetail deer. When slung properly as taught in the Marines, there is virtually zero recoil.

Could Oswald pull off 3 shots in about 6.8 seconds for 75 yards and less?

With what I have learned over the years about firearms and what the Marines teach. Oswald could have gotten off the three very easily.

16 posted on 11/24/2008 11:45:38 AM PST by Pistolshot ("Democrats don't show respect, they just demand respect " - ClearCase_guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

“He saw a man in a business suit and fedora raise a rifle, saw a puff of smoke and ran down a fence line”

It was Dick Cheney who, after firing the fatal shot, boarded Elvis’ Halliburton-funded spaceship and they escaped through a time portal to Sept. 11, 2001 so they could fire the killer lasers that blew up the World Trade Center. There. It’s solved. /heavy, heavy sarc


17 posted on 11/24/2008 11:48:08 AM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
“Puff of smoke”?

It was apparently used to create a diversion,

Yeah cause it would be ludicrous to believe it could have been a smoker who was watching the motorcade like the hundreds of other people...(rolls eyes...)
18 posted on 11/24/2008 11:48:08 AM PST by RedMonqey (Embracing my "Inner Redneck")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
I find it very suspicious that so many of the assassination witnesses are dying off.
19 posted on 11/24/2008 11:49:16 AM PST by Carl LaFong (I'm Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl LaFong

“I find it very suspicious that so many of the assassination witnesses are dying off.”

Maybe because they’re, like, OLD now??


20 posted on 11/24/2008 11:50:20 AM PST by ScottinVA (Gloucester County, VA -- Standing for America! 63% for McCain-Palin on 4 Nov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson