Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cinnamon Girl
I had Sammon's book but it has been lent out so I'll take your word for it. I still disagree though. Lieberman was trying to cover his and Gore's a$$es after the SHTF and made no meaningful effort to change strategy. If you listen to his statement he is speaking for both Gore and himself and merely deflecting attention after the fact. He was happy to go along until that moment.

The majority of military ballots were being contested because they didn't have postmarks which many never have. All he said was they should be looked at again, not that they should be counted.

27 posted on 11/25/2008 11:53:10 AM PST by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Eagles6

Sammon’s take plays kind of like the HBO bit in that Lieberman was told the argument about how to ditch the ballots, but then he went on t.v. and didn’t support that position. I understand the argument that it was already too late to ditch the ballots, but even Sammon said that what Lieberman said on t.v. was used by the GOP to count the ballots.

I guess you have to ask yourself what the point of trashing Lieberman is. He is reviled by the left, as a search on You Tube will show you. If he did everything for his own sake, why did he support the war? That’s what lost him dem backing in his own primary. Even now, he went on Brokaw’s show and wouldn’t apologize for what he said in the campaign or for campaigning on behalf of McCain. He said he regretted some of what he said, but he wouldn’t apologize.


28 posted on 11/25/2008 12:14:19 PM PST by Cinnamon Girl (G-d Bless President Bush. He kept us safe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson