[SkyPilot]

They are "Militants" - the media will not refer to them as Muslims. ...........but by every other euphemism.

Assailants - National Public Radio.
Attackers – the Economist.
Bombers – the Guardian.
Captors – the Associated Press.
Commandos – Agence France-Presse refers to the terrorists both as "membres du commando" and "commando."
Criminals - the Times (London).
Extremists – United Press International.
Fighters – the Washington Post.
Group – the Australian.
Guerrillas - in a New York Post editorial.
Gunmen – Reuters.
Hostage-takers - the Los Angeles Times.
Insurgents – in a New York Times headline.
Kidnappers – the Observer (London).
Militants – the Chicago Tribune.
Perpetrators – the New York Times.
Radicals – the BBC.
Rebels – in a Sydney Morning Herald headline.
Separatists – the Christian Science Monitor.

[RushLake]

islamic filth - RusLake.

[jersey117]

Perpetrators – the New York Times.

The NY Times had the friendliest description.

[mewzilla]

The Beeb also uses the word militants to describe the men who killed the leader of the anti-terrorist squad.

Sigh.

[L,TOWM]

Murderous Muslim Savages - L,TOWM

Our news organs are deliberately attempting to obfuscate the fact that civilization and Islam are incompatible.

Once the common folk in the Western democracies draw that conclusion, we may just demand our that our leaders attempt to achieve the same objectives that the death cult of Islam demands from its followers: universal death or conversion.

[angkor]

Assailants - National Public Radio.
Attackers – the Economist.
Bombers – the Guardian.

[snip]

Thanks for that list.

We must rise above our wholly justified indignation toward an endemically lazy, corrupt, cowardly, and demented MSM.

[Texas_shutterbug]

Should the members of the IRA have been referred to as "Catholics?"

"Catholics bombed a hotel today...."

"Today, Catholics entered a restaurant and started shooting..."

Personally, I prefer the term "terrorists" to Muslims, Catholics, militants, etc."