Skip to comments.
Does the World Need a Global Population Control Agency?
Catholic Online ^
| 12/13/2008
| By Steven Mosher
Posted on 12/13/2008 12:53:02 PM PST by GonzoII
The idea of controlling human fertility deserves to be as thoroughly discredited as Marxist-Leninism, and for the same reason: It is at heart a philosophy of state coercion.
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eugenics; lifehate; populationcontrol; stevenmosher; un; unfpa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
12/13/2008 12:53:03 PM PST
by
GonzoII
To: wagglebee; narses
2
posted on
12/13/2008 12:54:27 PM PST
by
GonzoII
("That they may be one...Father")
To: GonzoII
Does the World Need a Global Population Control Agency? I'm for it, as long as they put me in charge of it.
To: GonzoII
The U.S. military should be tasked with this, starting in the Middle East.
4
posted on
12/13/2008 12:57:14 PM PST
by
ConservaTexan
(February 6, 1911)
To: GonzoII
No, but the developed world might be able to use agencies to encourage marriage and childbearing, such most of the First World countries have reproduction rates below replacement level -- often well below replacement level.
To: GonzoII
Might wanna ask the Ford Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Eugenics Record Office, Race Betterment Foundation, Procter & Gamble, etc.
6
posted on
12/13/2008 1:00:13 PM PST
by
BGHater
(Obama is a Neocon.)
To: BGHater
Absolutely, all Liberals, Mobsters and DemocRATS (one and the same)need to be sterilized.
7
posted on
12/13/2008 1:02:59 PM PST
by
stubernx98
(cranky, but reasonable)
To: GonzoII
The idea of controlling human fertility deserves to be as thoroughly discredited as Marxist-Leninism, Marxist-Leninism has made great strides in reducing human populations.
8
posted on
12/13/2008 1:03:24 PM PST
by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: stubernx98
Absolutely, all Liberals, Mobsters and DemocRATS (one and the same)need to be sterilized. I read that an effect method of sterilization is boiling.
9
posted on
12/13/2008 1:09:42 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(You don't have a soul. You are a Soul. You have a body. -C.S. Lewis)
To: GonzoII
Yes. Liberals/Socialists should...must not be allowed to have kids.
Corrupt genes, doncha know.
10
posted on
12/13/2008 1:24:16 PM PST
by
dbacks
(God help the USA.)
To: GonzoII
DCBurgess58 hereby commands that all nations besides the European nations, The United States, Canada, Austrailia and New Zealand undergo 95% population sterilization. The 5% allowed to reproduce will be handpicked based on respect for the United States, a desire to continue living in their home nation, a good work ethic and honesty.
The European nations, The United States, Canada, Austrailia and New Zealand will undergo 60% sterilization. The 40% allowed to reproduce will be handpicked based on respect for the United States, a belief in conservative values, a good work ethic, honesty and a bathing suit competition.
/Sarcasm off....... INCOMING!!!
To: DCBurgess58
You’re a stupid communist, eugenics, socialist, and a communist Marxist.
/flame off.
You don’t get to pick who gets their breading controlled unless you went to Harvard or Yale or the University of Oklahoma.
Go Non-Sooners!!
12
posted on
12/13/2008 1:48:19 PM PST
by
demshateGod
(the GOP is dead to me)
To: demshateGod
lol, sorry I forgot that part... mea Culpa
To: demshateGod
14
posted on
12/13/2008 1:54:46 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Reagan wouldÂ’ve fired them.)
To: DCBurgess58
Whoops, I wrote breading. What could that possibly mean? Obviously I’m going to be on the neuter list.
15
posted on
12/13/2008 1:55:28 PM PST
by
demshateGod
(the GOP is dead to me)
To: GonzoII
This is News????
16
posted on
12/13/2008 1:56:38 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: ichabod1
That reminds me, I have some cheesecake in the refrigerator that wants some nibbling.
17
posted on
12/13/2008 1:56:56 PM PST
by
demshateGod
(the GOP is dead to me)
To: demshateGod
I thought you were taking it that one step further and breading them before cooking.
To: Question_Assumptions
Since two parent families are repeatedly show to improve life outcomes for children (less likely to end up in jail, on drugs, mental illness, etc), even encouraging marriage without impacting birth rates is a step in the right direction.
19
posted on
12/13/2008 2:00:25 PM PST
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: GonzoII
You really want to know what would drive fertility down, and be completely acceptable to nearly 100% of the world's religions, at least the ones that seem to concern themselves with their adherents's sexual choices?
We need to develop a pill form of a medication that would virtually guarantee male offspring, then get it out on the black market. The most backwards, sexist societies would breed themselves out of existence in three generations.
20
posted on
12/13/2008 2:13:20 PM PST
by
hunter112
(We seem to be on an excrement river in a Native American watercraft without a propulsion device.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson