Al Gore's head must be spinning.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
“And while intense hurricanes and tornadoes steal headlines for their intense winds and overall destruction, the new map shows what other previous studies have found, that everyday hazards, such as severe winter and summer weather, and heat account for the majority of natural hazard deaths in the United States.”
AL GORE SCARE MORE PEOPLE!
Hurry up!
Time is money.
2 posted on
12/17/2008 11:15:13 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I figured my demise would be at my own home when a certain lady found me with another certain lady and instead of apologising I’d invited her to join me... hence the “cold day in Hell” comment would be uttered moments before I was plonked.
3 posted on
12/17/2008 11:15:20 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Is this propaganda supposed to convince me not to have any more hurricane parties?
4 posted on
12/17/2008 11:16:50 AM PST by
ryan71
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
5 posted on
12/17/2008 11:16:50 AM PST by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Join us on the best FR thread, 8000+ posts: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1990507/posts)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Southwest Ohio Dark Blue bump.
Looks as if Arkansas is the most dangerous state.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Borden and Cutter/BioMed Central Ltd.
Risk of death from natural hazards by county; red is more likely than average, blue less likely.
7 posted on
12/17/2008 11:17:54 AM PST by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Join us on the best FR thread, 8000+ posts: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1990507/posts)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
"People living in the South along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts have a higher likelihood of dying from a natural hazard compared to residents of the Great Lakes area and urbanized Northeast."
Whereas in the "urbanized Northeast" one is more likely to be killed on the street for their cab fare money.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
holy carp! this makes detroit look like a safe place to live!!
9 posted on
12/17/2008 11:18:44 AM PST by
absolootezer0
(Detroit- hey, at least we're less corrupt than Chicago)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
North Philly should be a bright fire engine red...
10 posted on
12/17/2008 11:18:52 AM PST by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Interesting that northern Arizona and southern Utah should rank so high. I expect this is a function of a smaller population along with a large number of people engaging in hazardous outdoors activities in the national parks etc. Flash floods, blizzards and lightning do get a few people every year out this way. I would have guessed California or the Gulf Coast ranked higher, but apparently not.
-ccm
12 posted on
12/17/2008 11:20:04 AM PST by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
analyzed nationwide data from 1970 to 2004. Note Katrina data is not included.
Overall, during the study period, nearly 20,000 people died due to natural hazards.
This amounts to about 580 people a year. Not enough to justify concern for our own safety should we be living in a red area.
21 posted on
12/17/2008 11:27:22 AM PST by
Between the Lines
(I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
The likelihood of death is 100%, regardless of geographic location.
The likelihood of a poorly written headline does spike by media type, however.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Seeing as everyone dies; isn't life the leading cause of death?? I think your more likely to die because your alive, not so much where you live. Sure different types of incidents kill people in different geographical locations, but at the end of the day people have died everywhere in the world for all sorts of reasons. But if they weren't alive in the first place they couldn't die at all. We still have obituaries in my local news sources.
28 posted on
12/17/2008 11:32:45 AM PST by
skully
(The GOP don't need no "Uncle Colins")
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I hate to apply econometrics in a discussion like this, but most people should realize that the standard deviation is like the z or t stat. In this case, it really applies since 1.5 is not significant from zero at 5% confidence interval. So basically, there is no evidence of one area being worse than another given the info we have on the chart.
29 posted on
12/17/2008 11:33:02 AM PST by
In veno, veritas
(Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
People living in the South along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts have a higher likelihood of dying from a natural hazard compared to residents of the Great Lakes area and urbanized Northeast. It would appear that automobile fatalities from snow and ice are minimal or not figured in to the equation.
39 posted on
12/17/2008 11:47:48 AM PST by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat. But they know what's best.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
I’d rather face a hurricane or tornado than walk through some streets in America were the chances of getting shot are very good!
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Hopefully, Yankees will read this and stop moving South!
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
The way I see it, the map depicts blue=less nature, red=more nature.
51 posted on
12/17/2008 12:06:55 PM PST by
American_Centurion
(No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
What a stupid title. The likelihood of death is 100% among all humans. NOBODY gets out alive.
To: MassRepublicanFlyersFan
Looks like you can live forever in O.C., CA.
58 posted on
12/17/2008 12:24:01 PM PST by
Yaelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson