Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Minnesota Canvassing Board in the process of stealing the Senate seat for Franken
Star Tribune ^

Posted on 12/17/2008 6:00:25 PM PST by flintsilver7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Seven plus One

Unless they’re absentees, then they’re trash. period.


21 posted on 12/17/2008 6:27:00 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MathDoc

Oh, you’re absolutely correct. The thing is, they’ve already discarded the rules. They’re just selectively applying them and - surprise, surprise - they seem to be doing so in a way that helps Franken.


22 posted on 12/17/2008 6:27:05 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasnÂ’t caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

Yup, I sat and watched them on the webcast determine that no. 1 was a vote for Franken and decided that this is the end of the Republic.

Its time to take the gloves off and sue to get entire Minneapolis precincts taken out because of rampant fraud. This will require a microscopic look at the voter rolls and verifying their addresses.


23 posted on 12/17/2008 6:27:53 PM PST by gore_sux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I’ve been meaning to download all of them for a potential statistical analysis of the “questionable” votes to see if they do indeed make the difference. (I believe they will.)


24 posted on 12/17/2008 6:27:53 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasnÂ’t caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

I predict fecAl Franken by at least 200 “votes”. It doesn’t take much intellect to see this is in the bag for him. Republicans will whine about it, but will in the end do nothing. But, shame on those who voted for him.


25 posted on 12/17/2008 6:29:14 PM PST by ScottinVA (islam IS the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

God bless you and welcome home.


26 posted on 12/17/2008 6:29:27 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

What can we do? I don’t live in Minnesota. I can’t force them to follow the laws. All I can do is sit here and take the data that’s made available to me (at great presonal inconvenience) and try to show it to anybody who will look.

We’re not powerless, but we’re close.


27 posted on 12/17/2008 6:31:01 PM PST by flintsilver7 (Honest reporting hasnÂ’t caught on in the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Faith

Thank you. There are still thousands of people without power in southern NH. I live north of where all the trouble is.


28 posted on 12/17/2008 6:31:58 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (All points of view tolerated...as long as they agree with mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Why the little 'x' on the one that is heavily filled in for Coleman? I would suspect someone of quickly marking the little 'X' to spoil that ballot.

The first one actually looks like a voter changed their mind or something. The second looks like it was purposefully spoiled to me.
29 posted on 12/17/2008 6:33:01 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
Let's wait and see what the final count is before we set ourselves on fire, ok?

Currently, Coleman is up by 358. Click on the "Politics" tab at the top right of the picture.
30 posted on 12/17/2008 6:35:36 PM PST by papasmurf (Impeach the illegal bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

Of course they will count until Franken wins. After all, he is the most qualified. A has been commedien who never was funny......perfect Democratic candidate


31 posted on 12/17/2008 6:36:41 PM PST by KellyM37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

Well one thing I can conclude from looking at those two samples of disputed ballots: some people are really just too STOOOPID to vote!!

Both ballots show a serious lack of the kind of simply blackened oval that the instruction at the top indicates is the way to indicate one’s vote for each chosen candidate.

But I agree that the one “for” Coleman is more obviously for Coleman than the one claimed for Franken.


32 posted on 12/17/2008 6:37:39 PM PST by Enchante (Was Jesse Jackson, Sr. the bagman for "Senate Candidate #5" -- JJJr.??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

Disgraceful.


33 posted on 12/17/2008 6:45:17 PM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
The examples that you provided look pretty clear...until you follow the link at the website to view the entire ballot. Many are such a jumble of blacked out circles, X’s, and check marks that it looks like a bunch of Floridians moved to Minnesota. Why couldn't these voters pick one method and use it consistently for the votes for President, Senate and local offices?
34 posted on 12/17/2008 6:45:59 PM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

The problem is that they are going through the Franken challenges right now, which are mostly a sham to take Coleman votes out. Coleman had to do essentially the same thing and has many sham challenges to legit Franken votes.

The fact that they are counting no. 1 as a Franken vote is definitely a new vote for Franken since nobody in their right mind would ever count that as anything but an over-vote previously. Coleman is going to have run up a huge lead to survive the review of his challenges


35 posted on 12/17/2008 6:46:18 PM PST by gore_sux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: papasmurf

“Currently, Coleman is up by 358.”

From what I have heard, Coleman gains votes with each day’s count.


36 posted on 12/17/2008 6:46:44 PM PST by dbacks (God help the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7

who designed these ballots? what a lousy design..


37 posted on 12/17/2008 6:48:01 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

My 5 year old can fill in an oval better than that. These voters are barely functional idiots.


38 posted on 12/17/2008 6:49:27 PM PST by omega4179 (Ramos and Compean we are thinking of you this christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: highpockets
You left out being alive. Only Repubs have to be breathing to be able to vote.
39 posted on 12/17/2008 6:53:18 PM PST by JimC214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7; All
Whenever a Republican or Conservative or both attempts to run against a Democrat in New York their designating petitions get an anal exam by the Democrats. Inevitably, if the petition is in the least deficient, the non-Dem is denied ballot access. If I ever turned in a petition sheet with these scrawls on them it would be immediately rejected.

However, if they vote for a Democrat in any state, including Minnesota, then their vote counts.

This is the big city Democrat machine politics approach to voting. At this level it is very difficult to defeat these people because we are playing their game on their court.

The only way we can win is if we post a sufficiently high ballot total on the machines on election day so that they cannot manipulate the recount or absentee/emergency ballots.

This travesty is an excellent example of the results of why the lefties attacked Diebold and the computerized voting machines. They wanted a paper trail that they could manipulate for their own purposes. In the automated process they cannot fix the process as they have on many manual voting machines (Shoup, etc) by either front end loading them or blocking off the lever of the opposition.

Fortunately for our side there may be additional elections, and there most certainly will be a census taken in 2010 which will show great growth in Red states than Blue states and thus will lead to a Congressional District/Electoral vote alignment toward those states. This I suspect, and hope, will result in a restoration of control of the House to GOP hands, and the election of a conservative Republican president in 2012 provided only registered Republicans are allowed to vote in the primaries and caucuses.

40 posted on 12/17/2008 6:58:56 PM PST by cyberslave (The time has come to talk of many things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson