Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazon pollution case could cost Chevron billions[$27 Billion]
AP ^ | 20 Dec 2008 | AP

Posted on 12/20/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by BGHater

Chevron faces potential $27 billion bill in Amazon pollution lawsuit

When the sun beats particularly hot on this land in the middle of the jungle, the roads sweat petroleum.

A Rhode Island-sized expanse of what was once pristine Amazon rainforest is crisscrossed with oil wells and pipeline grids built by Texaco Inc. a generation ago. And for the past 15 years, a class-action lawsuit has been winding its way through the courts on behalf of the more than 125,000 people who drink, bathe, fish and wash their clothes in tainted headwaters of the Amazon River.

Now a single judge is expected to rule in the case in 2009 from a ramshackle courtroom in this northern frontier town. Statements from a court-appointed expert suggest Chevron Corp. -- which bought Texaco in 2001 -- will be held responsible for the many oil spills and dumping of wastewater. If Chevron loses, it could be ordered to pay up to $27.3 billion in damages, though an appeal would be likely.

The expert, geological engineer Richard Cabrera, largely accepts plaintiffs' claims that Texaco left a mess when it left in the early 1990s. He is recommending damages based partly on his calculation of 1,401 pollution-caused cancer deaths.

Chevron does not deny "the presence of pollution and we don't deny that there were impacts," says spokesman Kent Robertson. But Chevron contends a 1998 agreement that Texaco signed with Ecuador, after spending $40 million on remediation, absolves it of any legal responsibility. It says, and few dispute, that its former partner, state oil company Petroecuador, kept polluting after Texaco departed.

When Donald Moncayo was a kid, he remembers, Texaco soaked the dirt thoroughfares it cut through the jungle with crude to keep dust down.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: amazon; chevron; ecuador; energy; rainforest; texaco

1 posted on 12/20/2008 11:34:01 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater
"..and few dispute, that its former partner, state oil company Petroecuador, kept polluting after Texaco departed..."

Pfft.....!

2 posted on 12/20/2008 11:40:13 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
once pristine Amazon rainforest is crisscrossed with oil wells and pipeline grids built by Texaco Inc. a generation ago

What wealth Ecuador has was built by Texaco and companies like it.

Ecuador has little that oil didn't buy it.

When Texaco pulled out of the country, it handed over its assets to the government oil company with the agreement that the government oil company in accepting Texaco's assets accepted also the job of dealing with any environmental issues.

The practices used were normal at the time they were done. Texaco spent millions cleaning it up, and the government oil company agreed to finish the work in return for Texaco's properties. If Texaco must finish the cleanup, Ecuador should return the oilfields as well.

They had an agreement. Ecuador is backing out of the agreement, but without returning the property. You can't have it both ways.

3 posted on 12/20/2008 11:41:54 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Pure unadulterated shakedown. Should just tell them to pound sand.
4 posted on 12/20/2008 11:45:58 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Screw this!


5 posted on 12/20/2008 11:46:11 AM PST by IbJensen (The fat lady has sung and it was awful. Coming up: Maya Angelou!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
A Rhode Island-sized expanse of what was once pristine Amazon rainforest ...

A gnat on an elephant's butt. Is petroleum foreign to this planet?

6 posted on 12/20/2008 4:06:51 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Good evening.

Is petroleum foreign to this planet?

Def: An 'abiotic' substance that seeps through the sea bed off the coast of Ft. Lauderdale, and other places. Sometimes requiring a dose of GoJo after a day of surfing. (See, oil wells in the Everglades)

5.56mm

7 posted on 12/20/2008 4:18:53 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
Howdy!

I have read that the amount of petroleum that gets into the sea due to human activity is a very small percentage of all the oil that seeps into the sea. That said; it would be a major pain to have to GoJo yourself after a swim.

I always wanted to surf but CO is somewhat surf challenged. I guess I didn't want to surf bad enough to go to CA. No regrets.

8 posted on 12/20/2008 4:40:20 PM PST by TigersEye (I threw my shoe at Mohammed and hit Allah in the butt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson