Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Governor]Palin invited to speak at conservative gathering (CPAC)
The Anchorage Daily News ^ | December 22, 2008 | Kyle Hopkins

Posted on 12/23/2008 2:18:37 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Gov. Sarah Palin's next act on the national stage could come as early as February, at a major conservative convention in Washington, D.C.

The annual event is called the Conservative Political Action Conference, and Palin was supposed to be the keynote speaker last February, long before she became a household name as the Republican choice for vice president.

When Palin couldn't make it, Vice President Dick Cheney took her place.

The convention isn't affiliated with the Republican Party, but big-name Republicans make a point of stopping by. It's where presidential candidate Mitt Romney conceded to John McCain this year, and where McCain drew boos from self-described "Reagan conservatives" -- and national headlines -- when he talked about immigration.

Now the 2009 convention is just two months away, and Palin is expected to speak to the thousands of conservative activists and college students that attend each year, director Lisa De Pasquale said in a phone interview Monday.

A Palin spokesman said it's no sure thing.

It would be the third time Palin has left Alaska -- and claimed the national spotlight -- since losing the Nov. 4 election. She spoke at a Republican Governors Association meeting in Miami during the second week of November; earlier this month, she campaigned in Georgia for Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss before meeting with President-elect Barack Obama in Philadelphia along with a group of other governors.

That last trip drew complaints from local Democrats who said Palin's time would be better spent at home on state business. At the time, a spokesman said the governor had been hard at work on Alaska issues and compared her time campaigning to a vacation day.

"We actually saw her at the (Republican Governors Association) conference and she reiterated that she did want to be there, " De Pasquale said.

(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 2012; cheney; cpac; elections; gop; mcbama; mccain; mccainrejected; mccaintruthfile; mcqueeg; palin; republicans; saracuda; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Why would Senator McCain want to attend a conservative convention?
1 posted on 12/23/2008 2:18:37 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The disdain that the 52%ers had (however misdirected) towards the Pubs, took a big positive shot in the arm by Conserv types by Palin.
If the Pub party is to have any hope, it is within a Reaganesque true conserv.

I will watch Palin, I will not watch the Arizona Senator.

Maverick my a$$.


2 posted on 12/23/2008 2:26:45 AM PST by ChetNavVet (Build It, and they won't come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m tellin’ you right now, if McLame had won the White House he would have destroyed the conservative movement. 8 more years of big-government “compassion” ala Bush piled on top with McLame’s eager to please the media and the left persona would have left us utterly ruined. At least from here we have a chance to come back. With a McLame in office we would have been devastated.


3 posted on 12/23/2008 2:31:12 AM PST by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I was there this year and saw Romney’ concession speech. Was interview by a few media, never saw any results. They wanted the pathos of Romneys supporters which were very strong there. I did not give them that since it was important to defeat the Democrats.


4 posted on 12/23/2008 2:32:40 AM PST by fernwood (those who sacrifice freedom for safety, get neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus
At least from here we have a chance to come back.

I agree.

And we are in better shape technologically than we were in 1992. Back then, all we had was talk radio and a few conservative publications. We now have an extensive online communications network and the ability to challenge the Drive-Bys head-on. Additionally, the Drive-Bys influence is waning daily.

5 posted on 12/23/2008 2:37:26 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

Excellant point! I believe Palin can bring us back but she will face roadblocks from most of the RNC/GOP DC elites. She is resented by most of the Pubbies in the Senate whether they will admit it or not.

Some may have learned a lession...Chambliss for example...but too many have their little kingdoms to protect.


6 posted on 12/23/2008 2:48:00 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb
"And we are in better shape technologically than we were in 1992. Back then, all we had was talk radio and a few conservative publications. We now have an extensive online communications network and the ability to challenge the Drive-Bys head-on. Additionally, the Drive-Bys influence is waning daily." Two quick points if I may. Regarding your statement above, I believe you're right. Saul Anuszis, Chairman of Michigan GOP wants to be RNC Chairman. On Saul's watch we've endured two terms of Clueless Jenny Granholm, more of Karl Lenin looking over his glasses and talking down his nose at us, and the loss of the state house of representatives. Anuszis is a proponent of electronics communications.....something called twitter (I started with 10" b & w t.v. with three stations and don't know what twitter is); Anuszis is selling himself on his electronics skills. He is an empty suit and will lead the RNC all the way down the toilet.

2nd point. I hope CPAC doesn't invite semi-Colin, the Maverick, or any of the other so called "conservatives" of convenience this year or any other year.

7 posted on 12/23/2008 2:56:08 AM PST by RushLake (Typical White person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

The internet is a communications tool. We still have to have a conservative message and someone glib enough to sell it.

My point is that pandering to the Drive-By Media is no longer necessary and in fact is counterproductive.

They are part of the enemy and need to be treated as such by our candidates.


8 posted on 12/23/2008 3:11:46 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah Palin Song (revised lyrics just recorded!) "OUR SARAH"
9 posted on 12/23/2008 3:14:22 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mobile Vulgus

Agreed. I think a McLame victory could easily have been more detrimental, in the long haul, than *you know who* (my wife refuses to say the name). The only way to get a non-RINO administration is to start with a totally dysfunctional left wing disaster, as we’re about to experience. The MOM (Mass of Morons) will soon crave an adult American citizen as President. Well, I hope so. Our politics is so poisoned by the MSM. All so sad. But the MOM doesn’t care, just give them an Xbox, ipod, soft shoes and a warm place to dispense with their primary biological concerns, and they’re just fine.

Just move along, folks. Nothin’ happening here.


10 posted on 12/23/2008 3:14:22 AM PST by Check6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChetNavVet

I still support Sarah. Heck, anyone that the democrats of deathly afraid of is my choice for president. In my book she still rocks - big time.


11 posted on 12/23/2008 3:49:02 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

the Drive-By Media is no longer necessary and in fact is counterproductive.

Right. “O” is helping us and doesn’t know it. His arrogant manner is turning off the MSM when they ask him hard questions.


12 posted on 12/23/2008 3:56:58 AM PST by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We should ALL attend and throw tomatoes at juan the weak leftist.

LLS

13 posted on 12/23/2008 4:34:57 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!! so sue me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

Count me in!

LLS


14 posted on 12/23/2008 4:36:41 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!! so sue me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The truth here; like all 'truth' that never can serve the Left's agenda; is and shall remain; no more than an incovenience of fact; and shall be reconstructed; discounted and/or ignored accordingly.
15 posted on 12/23/2008 4:39:56 AM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Didn't mean to come across as attacking your points, twas not my intent by any means.

I agree with you on the MSM and modern communications tools. If it were up to me, I'd have told that twit Letterman, Katie Couric, SNL, and a whole host of media or ersatz media types that they weren't getting McCain or Palin on their programs. If you've demonstrated hostility toward us in the past or have been one sided in your approach, you are erased from the list of acceptable venues. When Tina Fey walked past Sarah Palin without having enough class to acknowledge her existence, they'd have known that that was the last time. I'd also have coached the candidates to use every opportunity they had in front of a tv camera or radio mic to deliver a specific attack or attacks on the opposition...sort of a canned speech if you will that is ready at the push of a button.

I think that along with utilizing modern tools, we have to find a way to refine the message. Rush was making a great point yesterday that the financial meltdown may have been an October surprise gone out of control. Try explaining his logic to the non-listeners and their eyes and brains glaze over.

16 posted on 12/23/2008 4:47:01 AM PST by RushLake (Typical White person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
post #15 posted on wrong thread/;^-\. Oh well. . .a bump for thread nonetheless. . .
17 posted on 12/23/2008 4:53:03 AM PST by cricket (America's Freedom Rings! Thank You ~ U..S.A. Military~/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushLake
Didn't mean to come across as attacking your points, twas not my intent by any means.

I didn't take it that way. And yes, we've got to go on the offensive regarding the MSM. Many people say the media is the PR arm of the Democrat party and the liberals. I think it's the other way around. The Democrat party is the political arm of the media elites, the liberals and the academic radicals.

18 posted on 12/23/2008 4:56:10 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RushLake

Obama could afford to do that having most of the MSM in his back pocket......but McCain was desperate....it was gamble or give it up. he lost.


19 posted on 12/23/2008 4:56:19 AM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MaggieCarta; indylindy; roamer_1; calcowgirl; djsherin; Sunnyflorida; SoConPubbie; Sybeck1; ...

McCain, meantime, wasn't invited to speak.

PWN3D!

The Juan McCain Truth File.

"I have great respect for Al Gore."
—John McCain, October 2, 2008

FR Keywords: mccaintruthfile, mcqueeg, mcbama

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  mccaintruthfile.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop mccaintruthfile.)


Republican Commissar’s Warning: By joining this ping list, you may be subjected to the delusional rants and ramblings of McCainiacs, of "moderate" Republicans, of pragmatic conservatives resigned to voting for the lesser of two Democrats, and of countless GOP shills who simply want to meet a new overlord.

20 posted on 12/23/2008 5:03:34 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson