Posted on 01/05/2009 6:33:10 PM PST by Clinging Bitterly
Massachusetts officially decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana yesterday, but many police departments across the state were essentially ignoring the voter-passed law, saying they would not even bother to ticket people they see smoking marijuana.
"We're just basically not enforcing it right now," said Mark R. Laverdure, chief of police in Clinton...
(Excerpt) Read more at officer.com ...
Folks in MA now need to watch the state legislature when they try to "fix" this little problem and make sure they don't take any new powers the people don't want the government to have.
Oregon deciminalized less than an ounce maybe 35 years ago. At the time, like MA is now, it was a $100 max. fine. Over time it has inflated and now it's closer to a grand. I don't know about MA but I don't think Oregon cops would risk a paper cut, much less walk across the street, for a mere hundred bucks. And that may be the real problem. Seems to me it would be easy enough to bamboozle the average doper into providing ID.
So, if a pot head is smokin’ dope in a no smokin’ zone will the fuzz still fine him for that? Just askin’.
its not illegal to give a false name for a civil ticket, so its a waste of paper and ink for the cop to even try it. I hope the masswipes enjoy the smell of pot everywhere.
I’m all for decriminalizing many drugs, but not arresting people doing it in public is folly. I doubt the police will let someone turn up a bottle of liquor on main street, and rightfully so. If people are going to do such things, it should be in a private residence.
Why would he? Only tar and nicotine are bad for you. Pot is good for you/sarc
“Massachusetts officially decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana yesterday, but many police departments across the state were essentially ignoring the voter-passed law, saying they would not even bother to ticket people they see smoking marijuana.”
Ok...I’m either confused or this line makes no sense..
The ‘decriminalized’ possession of marijuana and the police are ‘ignoring’ the law by not ‘bothering to ticket people’?
That make any sense to anyone else?
the = they...
It sounds like they aren’t worried about second hand toke in assachusetts.
High cops...
Must be...
:0)
Sure makes a difference who the prez is. Obama ain’t even prez yet and they are already working their way up to legalizing crack. Pretty soon, not only will prostitutes be legal, they’ll be running for office. And winning.
yeah. You can’t arrest them, you can only ticket them. So why bother?
“Andrew J. Sluckis Jr., chief of police in Auburn, said his 39 officers would not be issuing $100 citations for possession of an ounce or less of marijuana, as required under the ballot initiative known as Question 2.”
Ok..Got it now.
This law doesn’t ‘decriminalize’ it at all.
To ‘decriminalize’ something is to make it ‘exempt’ from fines or prosecution.
Not what this law does at all.
And we'll call them "Congressmen."
I am ashamed to say I was born in that cesspool. But, hey, it wasn’t up to me!
Perfect, decriminalization really means legalization because unless you are being a complete asshole chances are there will be no arrest for pot smoking as it should be everywhere.
Let’s empty 25% of our prison population arrested over pot use and jail real criminals instead.
Eventually if the damn government gets the heck out of the way. The weak will fail and our human race will become better. And then the meek will get er done.
Can you say REVENUE!?
Can you say REVENUE!?
I propose all recreational pharmaceuticals be laced with chemical castration additives. Then offer them free.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.