Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; All

I would say that is one good idea, and parts of this will still be built.

I do believe they need to make separate lanes for trucks.


11 posted on 01/06/2009 10:48:47 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas
I agree (See #10...)
14 posted on 01/06/2009 10:55:06 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
Roadways and utility rows will still be needed. I think they got way to far ahead of themselves with the concept and the people revolted against it.

Now it's back to the old method of building a few miles at a time, separate rows for rail, pipelines, transmission lines, etc and in the meantime the congestion gets worse.

You are correct about the I-35 corridor from San Antonio north to the DFW area. There are some tollroads being constructed paralleling parts of I-35 that hopefully will help some. Hopefully the Sequin to north of Austin 130 will eventually get funded and built.

29 posted on 01/06/2009 11:26:49 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas

Problem is, that it’s not just a new highway. It’s the “NAFTA Superhighway” that will eventually extend from Mexico to Canada, and is intended to be the vanguard for the open-borders of the “North American Community”.

The Pheonix may be dead...for the moment.


33 posted on 01/06/2009 11:39:35 AM PST by SandWMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson