To: devere
John Roberts is the Chief Justice, and also a brilliant lawyer. If he brings a previously rejected case to conference hes staking his reputation with his colleagues on it.No, he's not. Roberts is effectively killing it. This is done as a courtesy to the other justices. That people seem to think this means something different only goes to show how few people here have even a basic understanding of how the USSC operates.
This case will be denied 0-9 with no comment. You can count on it.
19 posted on
01/09/2009 9:00:28 PM PST by
Drew68
To: Drew68
Obama’s Presidency will go down in history as being illegal and pathetic. But then again he was the first!
23 posted on
01/09/2009 9:09:55 PM PST by
rocksblues
(Sarah and Joe, Real Americans!)
To: Drew68
This case will be denied 0-9 with no comment. You can count on it.I don't understand why Roberts would bring this case to conference as a courtesy to the other justices. Why would it be a courtesy, to give them a chance to swear off this issue forever?
56 posted on
01/10/2009 12:17:02 AM PST by
TheThinker
(Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
To: Drew68
Obot Clarions going off.
Yup . lets keep a lid on this kind of treasonous thinking, we can't let this get out of hand now can we?
Can't give conservatives any hope or change now can we?
Ahem.
Take a mydol and can it.
721 posted on
01/15/2009 4:10:29 PM PST by
Candor7
(Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, ( member NRA)
To: Drew68
1,221 posted on
01/21/2009 3:51:05 PM PST by
RobRoy
(Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in the 1930's.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson