Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deepest End

There is not one post on this thread that shows even the slightest bit of knowledge of how the Supreme Court operates and what the “cert pool” is and how Petitions For Writs of Certiorari are subject to “the rule of four.”
I urge folks to learn just a bit about the Supreme Court before posting nonsense that is embarrassing in its ignorance of high court procedures that should have been learned in any half way decent Civics class.

There is no case on appeal currently before the US Supreme Court asking to remove Barack Hussein Obama from the Presidency or to invalidate the election.


46 posted on 01/09/2009 10:37:17 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777

Writs of Certiorari
“the rule of four.”
and

.. Standing , are arbitrary terms established for the smooth working of the judiciary system. They are not laws established by the Constitution.


48 posted on 01/09/2009 11:03:00 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: jamese777; Congressman Billybob

Deepest End: If there is “no comment”, as has been the case, then how do you know it’s “0-9”? Or are you that pesky fly on the wall in the closed conference room?

jamese777:
There is not one post on this thread that shows even the slightest bit of knowledge of how the Supreme Court operates
and blah blah blah...
***Can you see that you never bothered to answer the guy’s guestion? I can see why you ended up on lj’s list of CoLB trolls. That was a beautiful example of obfuscation and misdirection. Why don’t you just answer the question, you miserable POS troll?

and what the “cert pool” is and how Petitions For Writs of Certiorari are subject to “the rule of four.”
I urge folks to learn just a bit about the Supreme Court before posting nonsense
***That’s great. Now we’re expected to be friggin’ experts on the inner workings of the SCOTUS. No thanks. That’s a combo classic fallacy — the appeal to the gallery (of knowledge) + an argument from silence (most of us have a silence of knowledge on this issue) + as I said, obfuscation. Maybe when you trolls lay off the classic fallacies, us normal freepers will start to read up more on constitutional procedures. It would help if those who knew and understood the process would answer the posts to them, but they appear to be too FReepin’ busy showing off their knowledge to higher mortals than us.

that is embarrassing in its ignorance of high court procedures that should have been learned in any half way decent Civics class.
***Bull Shiite. Plenty of us FReepers have been through half way decent civics classes, but you trolls seem to have trouble with the critical thinking classes. Take a 1/4 decent critical thinking class and then I’ll measure it up to my 1/2 decent civics class and we’ll still need to rely on guys like Congressman Billybob for specialized knowledge.


50 posted on 01/09/2009 11:33:24 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson