[Tarpon]

So who or what is running the hologram generator?

The Universe is hard for most people to comprehend. Heck Obama voters may not even know we are standing on a planet that goes round a nuclear furnace. Or the output of the nuclear furnace may not be, imagine that, a constant.

I find it curious that a science publication will give time to this puffery but not to debunking the AGW hoax. For instance, publishing the different laws of physics, thermodynamics and chemistry that need be violated if the AGW hoax is true. Strange wouldn’t you say.

Me, the Universe is what it is. And we may not know what that is.

[freedumb2003]

But nonetheless you better hope I don't wake up.

[Strategerist]

I find it curious that a science publication will give time to this puffery

So do you use the term "puffery" to describe things you don't understand?

[ChicagahAl]

“I find it curious that a science publication will give time to this puffery but not to debunking the AGW hoax”

Scientists mostly live off grant money. Grant money is awarded based on the most current, trendy, hopes and fears.

Scaremongering sells.

[devere]

“So who or what is running the hologram generator?”

God, of course.

The holographic universe theory seems very good to me.