Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brockhausen v. Andrade: Judge: “This Court has no Jurisdiction”; Update: US Attorneys...
The Right Side Of Life ^ | 1/23/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 01/23/2009 12:07:59 PM PST by rxsid

Brockhausen v. Andrade: Judge: “This Court has no Jurisdiction”; Update: US Attorneys Getting Involved

[snip}

Quote: " I wanted to thank everybody for concern and well wishes. I just got ome from TX after some 48 hours with only 3 hours of sleep.

TX judge Burt Carnes has allowed me to represent Jody Brockhausen against Secretary of State of TX, he has signed my application to represent her Pro Hac Vice (out of state attorney), but his decision was that he has no jurisdiction to hear the case in the state court.

It looked like his mind was made even before the hearing. He asked Assistant Attorney General how much time does she need, she stated 15-20 minutes, his response was that he needs only 3 minutes. He didn’t even ask the plaintiff if she needs any time. When I protested, he originally was not willing to let me talk. When I asked him to allow me to represent her pro hac vice, pro bono after I made an effort of flying and driving from CA all night long, he stated that he didn’t sign pro hca vice application, at which time I told him that there is nothing preventing him from signing it now. He finally agreed. I’ve stated that the examples given by the AJ relate to Fed Court and issues before the elections.

To the best of my knowledge there is nothing in TX law or precedents preventing a citizen from having standing and presenting a grievance and seeking resolution of violation of her civil rights in seeking verification of eligibility and legitimacy of the siting president. Judge Carnes provided no response and simply stated that there is no jurisdiction and pretty much told us to go, which we certainly did by going straight to the US attorney’s office with a criminal complaint whereby my client’s civil rights under 1st, 14 9 and 10th amendment were violated. If there is no jurisdiction in Federal court and State court, then the citizens have there civil rights de facto taken away from them and they are reduced to a level of slaves. A group of patriots and I had a meeting with Assistant US attorney Chris Peele and Chief US Attorney for the North-Western district of TX for Criminal matters, Chris Peele . Mr. Durbin agreed to hear the matter and asked for our paperwork. We were shocked to find out how little they knew about the matter. Mr. Peele told us that he was under the impression that the case was heard on the merits. They had no clue that no Obama ineligibility case was ever heard on the merits, not one judicial subpoena was ever issued and nobody has ever seen his original birth certificate.

Currently we are coordinating efforts to schedule personal meetings of groups of volunteers with Chief US attorneys for criminal matters in each and every district of the US. Mr. Ken Burr and George Lewis will be in charge of this projct." End Quote
[snip]

Source = http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=3070


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; artbell; batboy; bho44; birthcertificate; birthers; brockhausen; certifigate; conspiracytheories; constitution; deadhorse; donquixote; eligibility; firsthundreddays; forumshopping; frivolouslawsuit; frivolouslawsuits; holdmahbeer; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; obamatruthfile; only10moredollars; rinobullies; ronpaul; shortwave; taitz; tinfoilhats; tortreform; trilateral; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2009 12:08:01 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Judges and those those defending this POS Precedent are clearly running interference as he and his handlers are puking executive orders faster than we can review em ......

They will be held accountable.

Good luck in your efforts and Stay safe !


2 posted on 01/23/2009 12:19:03 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
They will be held accountable.

Not with 65 million drones out there in his corner. Add 12 million illegals, and kiss your "accountability" goodbye.

3 posted on 01/23/2009 12:22:15 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

There has to be a judge SOMEWHERE who will stand up for what is right.


4 posted on 01/23/2009 12:47:25 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. Margret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

The US Attorney will be replaced. They’ll all be replaced. Goebbels would be proud.


5 posted on 01/23/2009 12:48:59 PM PST by glock rocks (God loves stupid people; that's why He made so many of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

... just one judge who will subpoena Obama’s original birth certificate (and then enforce it).


6 posted on 01/23/2009 12:55:53 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

This is yet another example of people spending huge amounts of time and money on law school only to end up stupider in some ways at the end of it all. I cannot understand how the American people could have no standing in this matter. After all, we are, in fact, the employers of the government through taxation and the ballot box.

“The law is a ass.”


7 posted on 01/23/2009 1:00:11 PM PST by OneTimeComment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeComment

We have standing because we’ll keep talking!!


8 posted on 01/23/2009 1:14:48 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

Any law signed by Obama that has a criminal penalty will allow a person arrested under it to challenge the legality of the law under the suspicion that it was not passed within the confines of the Constitution. All they have to do is ask for a writ of mandamus to the State of Hawaii requiring them to release Obama’s ORIGINAL birth certificate. It is highly unusual for judge to deny a writ of mandamus if it would exonerate a person. If the judge refuses to issue it and the person is found guilt, it is grounds for an appeal.


9 posted on 01/23/2009 1:16:24 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. Margret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: real_patriotic_american

I do hope that someone hears one or more of these suits. If Obama were found ineligible but the only way to remove him was via impeachment and that didn’t happen, we’d at least have a definition of “natural born citizen” from the Supremes. That definition is essential.

People warn of riots if Obama were to be declared unqualified. What if the Obama voters elect the child of illegal aliens in a hard-fought election in ‘16 or ‘20, etc.? The upheaval from such a circumstance would be a lot worse than a few riots. How could such a president govern if we don’t all agree on whether he/she even qualifies?

Avoiding a difficult issue like this never works. It just sets us up for even more difficult times in the future, and this issue of who is natural born is surely not going away. It will, in fact, become increasingly relevant.


10 posted on 01/23/2009 1:38:23 PM PST by OneTimeComment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Either the citizen “has no standing” or the court “has no jurisdiction.” Somehow someone needs to come up with the perfect combination of words that can get some action.


11 posted on 01/23/2009 1:39:29 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (What's Obama's Secret?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeComment
"People warn of riots if Obama were to be declared unqualified. What if the Obama voters elect the child of illegal aliens in a hard-fought election in ‘16 or ‘20, etc.? The upheaval from such a circumstance would be a lot worse than a few riots. How could such a president govern if we don’t all agree on whether he/she even qualifies?"

Excellent points that I've subscribed to as well.

12 posted on 01/23/2009 1:50:16 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

Too bad that SCOTUS doesn’t seem to agree.

“A stitch in time saves nine!”


13 posted on 01/23/2009 1:52:51 PM PST by OneTimeComment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
They had no clue that no Obama ineligibility case was ever heard on the merits, not one judicial subpoena was ever issued and nobody has ever seen his original birth certificate.

If this DA solely listens to or believes the media it's no wonder he does not have a clue.

14 posted on 01/23/2009 1:56:47 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault
Either the citizen “has no standing” or the court “has no jurisdiction.”

Courts have no backbone.

15 posted on 01/23/2009 1:59:07 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
The US Attorney will be replaced. They’ll all be replaced. Goebbels would be proud.

He could try open a crack in Obama's defense before he gets the boot.

16 posted on 01/23/2009 2:01:39 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
but his decision was that he has no jurisdiction to hear the case in the state court.

Then state the reasons why you have no jurisdiction enlighten us?

17 posted on 01/23/2009 2:06:28 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Then state the reasons why you have no jurisdiction enlighten us?

In this one, the jurisdictional problem was crystal-clear: this was a Texas state court. State courts have no jurisdiction to review the qualifications of federal officials.

18 posted on 01/23/2009 2:22:37 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

They are going to CRUSH us, I am afraid.


19 posted on 01/23/2009 2:23:08 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

We will be BURIED alive by the inertia of their ennui!


20 posted on 01/23/2009 2:24:45 PM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson