Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2009 3:53:58 PM PST by fiodora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: fiodora
600 private jets flown by rich Democrats flew into the Inauguration. That's fine but the auto execs using theirs is a crime? In both instances, the people on those jets arrived in Washington wanting something from Washington, not just good will.
2 posted on 01/24/2009 3:59:07 PM PST by omega4179 (1.20.13 end of an error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Obama’s approval number has already ‘plummeted’ to 68% from 83% a week ago. His magic is fading fast.


4 posted on 01/24/2009 3:59:57 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Like all weak and deceitful leaders, Obama is trying to set up a DEMON in Rush. It is very clear. His ideological plans for this country are NOT WHAT AMERICANS WANT TO HEAR and he knows it. So he is trying to take attention off of his own lack of desire to do what is right FOR AMERICANS, and do what is “right” for his socialist liberal agenda.

This tactic is nothing new. Rush knows it. We know it.


5 posted on 01/24/2009 4:00:41 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

One more thing, Byron. Your publication and website have documented Obama’s ties to the teachings of Saul Alinksy while he was community organizing in Chicago. Here is Rule 13 of Alinksy’s Rules for Radicals:

“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

_________________________

The Palins.

I can’t type anymore or else I’d be banned.


8 posted on 01/24/2009 4:02:51 PM PST by JavaJumpy (Thanks, Mark Levin, for being there. You're a lifesaver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

As usual, El Rushbo stays above the fray and doesn’t take Obama’s bait. Obama was hoping Rush would react defensively to his remarks. Rush, instead, stays on point and turns the spotlight back on Obama and on the trillion dollar bailout debacle. His quote of Alinsky is priceless. I hope Rush, Mark Levin, et. al. will link Obama’s decisions/actions to Alinsky’s “rules” whenever possible. In doing so, they will prove the accuracy of their use of “Marxist” when describing Obama’s policies. Way to go Rush!


12 posted on 01/24/2009 4:06:08 PM PST by freedom4me (No compromise w/ the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact w/ unrepentant wrong. --Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Hussein better not pull on Superman’s Cape, he might help generate Rush’s Audience up way beyond 20 million listeners.

Rush is right, Rush is NOT the Focus. The Stimilus bill with no stimlus is the Focus, and “Truth in Stimulating” might get reported by the Media outlets that are collectively staring layoffs in the Face.

I think the MSM is participating in the Recession, and as Rush has said “I don’t participate in Rescessions”. Besides, Rush makes more Money than Hussein or any of his Media talking heads.


16 posted on 01/24/2009 4:08:41 PM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Gotta love it, we’re less than a week into the reign of the anointed one and Rush already has him reeling. Sic ‘em Rush! Can you imagine what this will do for El Rushbo’s ratings? I think we need to heap ridicule on His Fradulancy. Mencken was right, ridicule is the best antidote for buffoonery and pretentiousness. Just wait ‘til Obama’s suck-ass sycophants in the press turn on him. Then he’ll really be squirming.


17 posted on 01/24/2009 4:10:17 PM PST by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Good reply. Guess I will have to listen to Rush Limbaugh.


22 posted on 01/24/2009 4:17:12 PM PST by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

I’m not a big Rush fan. But I was amazed that Obama found Limbaugh in his care zone the first week of his Presidency. Something is definitely up with that. I’m pleased with Rush’s response and I think he has a really good point with “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Free speech is looking to be in short supply for the next 4 years.


30 posted on 01/24/2009 4:22:54 PM PST by nicolezmomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora
I just love Byron York. He's so great.

I not only had the pleasure of meeting him but I also had dinner with him and his wife on the National Review Cruise.

(See my home page for pictures.)

35 posted on 01/24/2009 4:25:02 PM PST by synbad600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora
Another thread on this here.
36 posted on 01/24/2009 4:25:51 PM PST by tapatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

How ridiculous. Didn’t Bill Clinton also whine about Rush when he was in office (something about it being unfair that Rush gets three hours a day to speak his mind)?

Don’t these Dems realize how petty they look when they try to attack talk show hosts?


42 posted on 01/24/2009 4:33:40 PM PST by Gunder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora; All
I wonder how Sean Hannity feels tonight now that he has been moved to #2 on the Obama critics list.

I guess Obama had to take his sights off of Sean because of the high ratings on his Television Show.

Obama's media people are exceptionally savvy and have targeted Rush instead of Hannity because Rush refuses to do TV. Hannity's voice is now aligned with his new new personae on the small scene.

Rush, who is the more poised and entertaining speaker, has a highly negative personae because he is not seen while speaking.

Obama's crew knows they have and can beat us on the radio, but they can't on the small screen. Its a shame that Conservative opinion cannot be found on a cable TV network of its own or on the sub-bans of Digital TV.

Fortunately, the weekly radio address of Obama's is being released in video, and that means that Boehner's reply ( Click Here To View) and that of whoever does the Republican reply in the future shall also have to be broadcast on the radio and released in video format to the tele. Boehner looked exceptionally distinguished and made an excellent point about the $275,000 tax dollars that will have to be spent to create or save a single job under the Bama's Recovery Plan.

Rush, get a makeover, and get on the tube again. Be there or be square!

49 posted on 01/24/2009 4:42:19 PM PST by cyberslave (The time has come to talk of many things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

mark


80 posted on 01/24/2009 5:18:48 PM PST by Christian4Bush (Role of the press: Republican scandal - prosecutors; Democrat scandal - Defense attorneys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Obama is setting up the excuses for his eventual failure rather quickly.


101 posted on 01/24/2009 5:47:38 PM PST by antiRepublicrat ("I am a firm believer that there are not two sides to every issue..." -- Arianna Huffington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

I wonder what Rush’s ratings will look like next week.
I’ll bet they will be up. Big.


114 posted on 01/24/2009 6:50:30 PM PST by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Everybody line up for the Two Minute Hate.


115 posted on 01/24/2009 6:50:52 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora
Rush is entirely correct in his assessment of Obama's motive(s).
Obama deserves nothing but to be called out on what he actually is: a mendacious, hypocritical, unethical, swine.
Any Republican, let alone a conservative, who believes amity can exist between they and Obama is suffering from a hefty bout of naivete.
Obama, like no other POTUS before, is literally, dangerous to America.
118 posted on 01/24/2009 7:32:23 PM PST by jla (Sarah! 45)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora
WINNER -- RUSH LIMBAUGH
 
LOSER -- BARACK OBAMA

120 posted on 01/24/2009 7:51:00 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fiodora

Rush says that Obama’s plan would preclude tax cuts and then says the majority of Americans would pay no taxes.

He says that this is not what America wants and then says Obama’s policies would lead to a permanent Democrat majority.

These statements are clearly contradictory and are not based on logic. Rush seems a bit nervous as well he should be.

Remember Obama only needs conservatives if he does not want to cave in to the far left. Otherwise he just needs 1 RINO and there are easily 3 out there.

If Obama wants just a pure far left agenda he can do it without the GOP for at least 2 years. If he wants to be able to push through logical programs that are only slightly left of center and be able to ignore the 5 most radical lefties, he needs a few Republicans.

I pesonally think Rush is wrong on this count. He will certainly get a ratings boost though; and Rush has consistently shown that he is far more interested in his own success than in that of the United States.

Rush’s tactics have only led to the US getting a President further to the left than Hillary and still leaving the country in a position where Hillary could be President. It was a massive “own goal” and Rush is partly to blame. Of course he still got his $400 million so what does he care?


123 posted on 01/24/2009 11:51:26 PM PST by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Bomb Liechtenstein!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson