Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Self-destructing over ethics
Yahoo.com ^ | February 19, 2009 | Larry Margasack

Posted on 02/19/2009 2:45:47 AM PST by Scanian

WASHINGTON – The Obama administration and the new Congress are quickly handing over to Republicans the same "culture of corruption" issue that Democrats used so effectively against the GOP before coming to power.

Freshman Sen. Roland Burris, D-Ill., is only the latest embarrassment.

Senate Democrats accepted Burris because they believed what he told them: He was clean. Burris now admits he tried to raise money for Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich, who authorities say sought to sell President Barack Obama's former Senate seat.

"The story seems to be changing day by day," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Wednesday.

The political mess for the Democratic Party, however, isn't Burris' conduct alone; it's the pattern that has developed so quickly over the past few months.

_The chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., is the subject of a House ethics investigation. It's partly focused on his fundraising practices for a college center in his name, his ownership financing of a resort property in the Dominican Republic and his financial disclosure reports.

_Federal agents raided two Pennsylvania defense contractors that were provided millions of dollars in federal funding by Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., chairman of the House Appropriations defense subcommittee.

_Blagojevich was arrested Dec. 9 on federal charges, including allegations he schemed to sell the Senate seat to the highest bidder.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoethics; corruptdems; democratcorruption

1 posted on 02/19/2009 2:45:47 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian
The Obama administration and the new Congress are quickly handing over to Republicans the same "culture of corruption" issue that Democrats used so effectively against the GOP before coming to power.

I don't know about that. The Dems have two very powerful allies. The MSM will say whatever talking points the DNC hands out to them. And they also have those lily-livered Republicans that will not say anything except, "Tut, tut! I hope they are more careful in the future."

2 posted on 02/19/2009 3:45:36 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Using corruption as a campaign issue works only if the party using it first publicly cleans its ranks of corruption. Otherwise, it will come back to bite you in the hindend. Just as it is doing to the Dems right now.


3 posted on 02/19/2009 4:02:24 AM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Digg it!

http://digg.com/politics/Democrats_self_destructing_over_ethics


4 posted on 02/19/2009 4:04:37 AM PST by villagerjoel ("Gun control is a prerequisite for genocide." - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

That would be “lack of ethics”.

LLS


5 posted on 02/19/2009 4:21:16 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussein will NEVER be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
All it will take is a single Republican to screw up in the summer of 2010. It will be all over the news, the people will be outraged, and the elections that year will be affected.

The people won't put up with a lack of ethics, you know.

6 posted on 02/19/2009 4:23:36 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (American Revolution II -- overdue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: villagerjoel

I say the only thing that will fix this - Bring them home.

One time I was listening to C Span and heard a wishy washy mealy mouthed middle of the road Rep. say he goes by the 80-20 rule. If a bill is 80% good he votes for it. I thought to myself at the time I would have loved to ask a follow up question of “What if we applied the same standard to lets say firefighters or Sergeons?”

It got me thinking - Most of the corruption is because of Washington Dc. They can’t even fix the school system that they are in charge of. The worst schools in the US are run by guess who? Where everything they try is 20-80.

There is no reason for these politicians to move to Dc. Even seemingly ethical (I know it is an oxymoron) pols. turn into status-seeking money grabbing amoral jerks.

In the age of electronic communication they should be forced to go by the 80-20 rule. 80% of their time and congressional budget should be spent at home. Think of the talented people that could run for office if they didn’t have to give up their homes and uproot their families. The more time these yahoos spend with each other the more havoc they wreak on the taxpayers.

They are acting like children who have eaten to much candy and are throwing temper tantrums demanding more. They should be forced to go home and take a nap.


7 posted on 02/19/2009 4:28:54 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Does this author think that dictators like Stalin, Mao and Hitler were worried about ethics? The liberals aren’t either.


8 posted on 02/19/2009 4:50:50 AM PST by caver (Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

******Senate Democrats accepted Burris because they believed what he told them: He was clean.*******

You are wrong son: Democrats knew this guy for the douchebag he is. He was so dirty even Harry Reid tried to axe him. Then they realised they needed that vote.

Don’t believe for one minute that Democrats didnt know what they were dealing with.


9 posted on 02/19/2009 5:00:14 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caver

The current crop of liberals is of that same totaletarian ilk, it appears.


10 posted on 02/19/2009 5:02:34 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Of course they did. The whole situation reeks of opportunism and hypocrisy.


11 posted on 02/19/2009 5:13:52 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Democrats accepted Burris because they believed what he told them: He was clean.

What did they expect?
He's a democrat, they knew what they were getting.

Remember this?

"Why did you bite me? I took you in, I cared for you. I fed you. You said you would't bite me."

"You knew I was a snake when you picked me up."

12 posted on 02/19/2009 5:17:17 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Don’t believe for one minute that Democrats didnt know what they were dealing with.

You're absolutely correct. They needed Burris' vote on the god-awful porkulus package. Now that it's passed and Obama has signed it, they're free to throw Burris under the bus.

13 posted on 02/19/2009 7:15:15 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson