Posted on 02/21/2009 4:14:16 AM PST by Man50D
A renowned expert on the life and work of sex scientist Alfred Kinsey, widely known as the "father of the sexual revolution," is raising alarms over President Obama's pursuit of sex "education" for kindergartners and his plans to install a pornography advocate in a top Justice Department position.
Judith Reisman is a Ph.D. researcher and scholar whose exposés of Kinsey have appeared in several books, including "Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences" and, most recently, a new DVD called "The Kinsey Syndrome."
The new video documentary reveals dramatically the profound impact on American society from the findings of the famous sexual revolutionary, who succeeded in overturning most of the morals and vice laws of World War II-era America. Not widely reported, although today proven beyond dispute, is that Kinsey based his research which concluded that 95 percent of American men in 1948 were sexual criminals on interviews with thousands of prisoners and prostitutes, fraudulently claiming them to be normal, middle class Greatest Generation Americans. He also discovered that children are sexual from birth and documented his research findings with the meticulous notes of serial pedophiles who sexually molested children as young as two months of age, documenting for Kinsey the toddlers sexual responses and timing them with a stopwatch.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
Obama hit the ground running paying back his money people—including the evil misanthropic abortion industry.
“Get them screwing young and murdering their babies sooner” is the motto.”
The Leftists learned this profitable policy from “Big Tobacco.”
Introversion/perversion is an effective way to separate a young mind from reality. The need will be filled, no doubt.
Good post. Why is it the more “sex education” we have, the further in the gutter we seem to go? To be upfront, I am a Christian and my views are based on scripture. The thing that frets me is that what is being taught in some of these courses undermines what I try to instill in my children. I sat down with each of my daughters and explained sex to them. As a parent, that’s my responsibility. I was extremely uncomfortable, but as my wife wisely pointed out, it would be good for them to get a male perspective from someone they love and trust. I know others disagree, but I would like to keep sex-ed out of the public schools. The public schools don’t do a good job of teaching reading, why should I trust them with teaching sex? The place for sex-ed belongs in the home, and in the churches. If you are going to teach the mechanics of sex, you must teach the morals that go along with it. What if my flight instructor taught me how to take the aircraft off, but not land? When you teach the mechanics of sex but not the moral things that go with it, that is what you have done. And both lead to a really bad outcome. Sorry I went on so long, but just felt I had to say this.-—JM
Sexual exploitation and government tax exploitation are intimatedly related activities. It’s all about adultery, emotional weakening, interference, fear mongering, insecuring, death/murder of life, enslaving, manipulation of democracy at the emotional legal level (it feels good, then it must be good, NOT) and general delegitimizing of society through sex acts and fake statistics.
nice condesation. not an extraneous word.
Am I missing something?!
It WAS pithy and pointed—I agree.
Even the majority of the people of Virginia had no problem with Jim Webb being elected as their Senator, even with his writings.
Obama and his supporters are simply pure evil.
I’ve read a couple of her books int he past. she is really good at her research and for laying out the truth in very clear to understand reasoning. I want to read this one, too! She’s awesome.
Matthew 18:6 But if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a large millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
You show your true face President Obama, your perversion even exceeds what I believed you were all along. Everyone look now, here is who you really voted for, enjoy.
These four (counting the lovely, evervescent Ma-shell) belong in strait jackets.
Obomba is covered with filth after crawling through the sewers to assemble his 'cabinet.'
Agreed. Unfortunately many psychiatrists are politically biased or in the profession for self-diagnosis.
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment
Obama: If they make a mistake, I dont want them punished with a baby.
"alarms over President Obama's pursuit of sex "education" for kindergartners and his plans to install a pornography advocate in a top Justice Department position."
It justs gets more absurd every day.
Obama Justice Nominee Used to Represent Playboy
Ogden also represented Playboy two decades ago in pushing for the federal court to stop then-Attorney General Edwin Meese from releasing a "black list" of distributors of allegedly pornographic content. He won that as well.Ogden frequently represented clients, not all of them nudie-magazines, who challenged what they saw as censorship and unconstitutional restrictions.
For instance, he once filed a brief on behalf of a group of library directors arguing against the Children's Internet Protection Act. The act ordered libraries and schools receiving funding for the Internet to restrict access to obscene sites. But Ogden's brief argued that the act impaired the ability of librarians to do their jobs. He called it "unconstitutional," though the Supreme Court later disagreed with him and upheld the act.
And he argued, on behalf of several media groups, against a child pornography law that required publishers of all kinds to verify and document the age of their models (which would ensure the models are at least 18). The provisions were struck down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.