Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativegramma

And you still failed to answer the original question which is not a gotcha question its a legitimate question you obama supporters can’t seem to answer. So I’ll ask it again: “Why should a kid playing soccer be REQUIRED to submit proof of U.S. citizenship while a PRESIDENT with his hand on the nuclear button DOESN’T HAVE TO?”
_________

LOL. I guess the part where I said “Frankly, I think anyone running for public office should have to provide basic proof of eligibility” went right over your head, even though you referenced it in your reply.

As for your reading of the 20th amendment, perhaps you should consider the notion of failing to qualify as meaning not having garnered enough electoral votes. The eligibility information is clearly stated in Article 2 Section 1.

As for your name calling, I was raised correctly, I will not disrespect my elders by responding in kind.


76 posted on 03/26/2009 11:22:28 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
LOL. I guess the part where I said “Frankly, I think anyone running for public office should have to provide basic proof of eligibility” went right over your head, even though you referenced it in your reply.

Nope. You did not specifically answer it yet again. Your above statement implies that you agree with my question, but then you restate that proof is not required in your view which then refutes your above statement. You can't have it both ways.

You either believe that "anyone running for public office should have to provide basic proof..." or you don't. You don't get to claim a statement that you agree it should be required then do a 180 and then claim the opposite. Are you being intentionally obtuse or were you just born that way???

As for your reading of the 20th amendment, perhaps you should consider the notion of failing to qualify as meaning not having garnered enough electoral votes. The eligibility information is clearly stated in Article 2 Section 1.

Yes it is and Article 2 section 1 clearly states 'natural born'. Says nothing about electoral votes. Perhaps you should consider the notion of failing to qualify means providing proof you meet the qualification of Article 2 section 1.

As for your name calling...

Now its my turn to go LOL! Calling you an obama supporter is now name calling?!? All you have to do is follow your posts on this birth certificate issue and you defend him every single time. Res Ipsa Loquitur.

81 posted on 03/26/2009 11:53:54 AM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson