Number one, the fossil record does not support evolution... number two I’m not discounting because it is less supportive. You can make more of an argument with something that doesn’t exist because you can make it up as you go along.
I don’t know how to rephrase the question so you understand what I’m asking. I want to know how you support evolution with so many species and not a single thing to fill the millions and millions of gaps. You answered my original question and I have acknowledged that in every post yet you still ignore the central issue: Fill in the gaps... seems like a simple task.
How do you figure that? It certainly does to me when I examine the evidence. In keeping with a discussion based on facts and evidence, please explain how it does not.
number two Im not discounting because it is less supportive.
Then why discount it?
You can make more of an argument with something that doesnt exist because you can make it up as you go along.
That statement doesnt make sense to me. The theory of evolution came about as an attempt to explain observed facts. Subsequent discoveries have only made the theory as a whole stronger as fossil discoveries and DNA evidence continue to fill in blank areas and confirm the predictions.
I want to know how you support evolution with so many species
How do you come to that as an argument against evolution?
and not a single thing to fill the millions and millions of gaps.
I think its been explained on this and other threads, but Ill go over it again. The odds are against any particular animal or plant becoming fossilized are high. The climate, soil etc. have to be exactly right. The odds against people then finding those fossils are also high we continue to find fossils and many may be in strata or formations that are inaccessible. So yes, there will be gaps. But - surprise! we continue to find fossils that fill in those gaps.
You answered my original question and I have acknowledged that in every post
Not exactly. You continue to say there is no evidence of speciation after Ive given you some. Id like to see you acknowledge there is evidence of speciation.
yet you still ignore the central issue: Fill in the gaps... seems like a simple task.
That was not the issue you initially declared central, it seems a late add-on. However to answer you, Ive told you above why it is not a fast or simple matter. Its like saying, find all the diamonds in the world now seems like a simple matter.