Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MinnesotaLibertarian

Sore loser my a**. This is an obvious vote fraud scam just like all the close recounts done over the last 15 years by the dems. Finding votes after the fact should be a no no, if they weren’t counted in the first count they shouldn’t be allowed. The “found” votes are always heavily in favor of the demwit candidate, they learned well from the Gore fiasco in 2000. Coleman is the clear winner, the sore loser is the one who keeps having recounts, “finding” votes that didn’t exist before and counting until they are ahead. What part of voter fraud don’t you understand?


13 posted on 04/02/2009 7:17:12 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: calex59

Limiting it to “400” ballots that can be contested is also rigging the recount.


15 posted on 04/02/2009 7:21:23 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Pres Obama just spent $150million of the $160million in returned AIG bonuses on a trip to England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: calex59
The recounts were mandated by law. It was the registering of tens of thousands of ACORN voters, the iffy canvassing process, and the arbitrary recount standards that gave Franken the lead.

No one really thought the lower Court challenges would be anything other than what they have proven to be... Partisan brinksmenship.

33 posted on 04/02/2009 8:23:19 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (1000110010101010100001001001111)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: calex59

I thought the original recount was mandated by law... no?


50 posted on 04/02/2009 12:24:53 PM PDT by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson