Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stale Material: Funnyman Cleese Still Bashing Bush
Federal Review ^ | Monday, April 20, 2009

Posted on 04/20/2009 1:10:57 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Americans... are “much too respectful to the president,” said Cleese

But of course one is not allowed to criticize the Obamessiah. I love Monty Python, but I certainly don't care for their political or religious views (the commentary on the Life of Brian video was worse than the movie itself in terms of disrespect for religious beliefs).

41 posted on 04/20/2009 2:12:07 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL
if you're a fan of the Andy Griffith Show, this will surely sicken you..

I know Andy is a big dim. The party tried their best to get him to run for the Senate a few yrs. ago.
I have heard a number of his endorsement commercials but didn't catch an O'Bama one.

Another big dim in North Carolina.. gasp...Dean Smith.

At least that's tempered by Coach K, a repub.

42 posted on 04/20/2009 2:24:17 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

>I have heard a number of his endorsement commercials
>but didn’t catch an O’Bama one.

Here’s the link again: (have a barf bag ready)
http://www.funnyordie.com/ron_howard


43 posted on 04/20/2009 2:30:32 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I remember “Fawlty Towers” (possibly the greatest sit-com of all time) and “A Fish Called Wanda” being peppered with hostile references to conservatives, Tatcher in particular. Basil Fawlty and Kevin Kline’s character were intentional gross charicatures of conservatives.

Who cares? A drop in the entertainment bucket. Cleese is old news. There are bigger fish to fry.


44 posted on 04/20/2009 2:38:20 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

“Finally, for some reason I’ve never been able to explain or understand, to me the funniest Monty Python bit ever was ‘The Fish Slapping Dance.’ I don’t know why, but it always cracks me up!”

It’s probably because it conforms strictly to the classical formula for humor: set-up followed by punchline. All humor, at its deepest level, is about irony and schadenfreude. ‘The Fish Slapping Dance’ is funny because you don’t see the big fish coming (or you remember back to when you once didn’t see it coming) and Michael Palin (was it?) looks like he gets hurt.

Ironically, the members of Monty Python set out to make no sense at all, and have their program be uncategorizably insane. They hated how traditional sketch shows had to have every scene end with a punchline. And they went a long way toward not ending their sketches, slamming ideas together, and generally making no sense.

Meanwhile, the jokes and sketches everyone remembers (nudge-nudge wink-wink, argument, dead parrot) had killer set-ups and punchlines.

For what it’s worth, my favorite Python scene is in “Holy Grail,” when Cleese thinks he’s coming to the aid of a damsel, repeatedly runs over the horizon, and brutally slaughters an entire castle full of people. The action itself is, but it ultimately works because he finds out it was all for nothing.


45 posted on 04/20/2009 2:50:23 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“...conservatives, Tatcher in particular.”

That is, “Thatcher”


46 posted on 04/20/2009 2:51:57 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
Who cares? A drop in the entertainment bucket. Cleese is old news.

Not true. There are millions of folks here and around the world, young and old, who love Monty Python. Given the fact that so few people pay attention to or understand politics, a popular personality like him would have a lot of influence.

47 posted on 04/20/2009 2:53:38 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“Not true. There are millions of folks here and around the world, young and old, who love Monty Python. Given the fact that so few people pay attention to or understand politics, a popular personality like him would have a lot of influence.”

I don’t doubt that he had an influence back then, or that he doesn’t still have some sort of hold on people past middle-age. My point is, Monty Python was 30 years ago. The last time Cleese was actually popular was no less than 20 years ago. I’d worry more about The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live, or anything else people still watch.


48 posted on 04/20/2009 2:57:18 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ETL

“...or anything else people still watch.”

On a regular basis, I mean. People my age might occasionally watch Python on PBS, BBC America, or DVD, but they are the vast, vast minority.


49 posted on 04/20/2009 2:59:04 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
I’d worry more about The Daily Show or Saturday Night Live, or anything else people still watch.

I definitely agree with that, but he still has a large following, both young and old. I've talked to a bunch of young people (under 30) who are big Monty Python fans.

50 posted on 04/20/2009 3:03:37 PM PDT by ETL (ALL the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
A small word in Cleese's defense: He's also pretty well known as a management consultant (seriously! - second career) and he may have been talking about 'Bush the manager' - who isn't all that well respected around here, either.
51 posted on 04/20/2009 3:04:32 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Americans... are “much too respectful to the president,” said Cleese, who went on to say that George W. Bush would not be able to survive a single press conference in England.

At least President Bush could get by without a teleprompter. ;o)

52 posted on 04/20/2009 3:07:40 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grut

Actually, he was contrasting British and American politics. Anyone who has seen Tony Blair match wits with Parliament would have to agree that not very many American Presidents would do nearly as well. Maybe Clinton, but not Bush and certainly not Obama. Having said that, I don’t know where Cleese has been that he has not witnessed the disrespectful things said about President Bush. Has he never heard of BDS?

Anyway, here is a more complete excerpt of what Cleese said.

Cleese then continued to explore the cultural difference between the two countries: “If you get famous, people here get so respectful to you in this country. There’s a kind of reverence, which is quite sickening,” Cleese said. “In England, if you’re famous, everyone’s so envious. If you want to be really popular in England, you need to have a big public failure.”

Cleese then related this reverence to American politics: “The problem in America is that you have a head of state who’s also the top political guy.”

Cleese explained that in England, one can be quite rude to the prime minister without insulting the figure head of the nation, the Queen. Americans, on the other hand, are “much too respectful to the president,” said Cleese, who went on to say that George W. Bush would not be able to survive a single press conference in England.

“It’s pathetic!” he exclaimed. “This is the most important country in the world ... It’s embarrassing because we want America to be great. There is emotion when I said that that because in the 60s we looked up to the U.S. as a beacon, because it was a smart place.”

“Eight years of this rubbish,” he continued. “The Brits were asking, “where is the American’s sense of outrage?”


53 posted on 04/20/2009 3:18:31 PM PDT by rwa265 (Christ, My Cornerstone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rwa265
Cleese asks, "Where's the Outrage?" I think what he has to understand that to many Americans, government, especially the Federal Government, really doesn't matter much in terms of our daily lives (at least up to now). We are consumed with our own lives, our families, our careers to really care too much about what happens in Washington. It's just another TV show, where we watch the characters and ridicule them. In reality, what goes on at our local town council meetings impact our lives much more than what happens in Washington DC. (Not that anyone is particularly paying attention to what goes on there either).

Whereas I think in Britain, people take the government much more seriously, and demand much more from it. They are conditioned to expecting government to be the solution. Unfortunately, it seems now we seem to be moving in that direction more than ever.

54 posted on 04/20/2009 3:27:14 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

This will probably cost Cleese a lot of corporate gigs. He is actually pretty good as a corporate trainer.


55 posted on 04/20/2009 6:32:20 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (I am a right wing extremist. God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
He is actually pretty good as a corporate trainer.

Although I'm not sure about his way of handling employee interviews...FIVE FOUR THREE TWO ONE!!!! Good night ding-ding-ding-ding....

56 posted on 04/21/2009 6:07:30 AM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Seriously, any bids on my complete collection of “Flying Circus” DVDs?


57 posted on 04/21/2009 6:09:31 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

He was funny once upon a time.


58 posted on 04/21/2009 6:14:18 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Wow, that video is sick, sad, and moronic. Did I mention idiotic? Have they left for Jonestown yet?


59 posted on 04/21/2009 6:25:51 AM PDT by Ezekiel (The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson