Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First papal visit for Charles since divorce
CNN.com ^ | April 27, 2009 | staff

Posted on 04/27/2009 11:46:57 AM PDT by Cincinna

Prince Charles visited the Vatican on Monday for his first meeting with a pope since his 1996 divorce from Princess Diana.

The heir to the UK throne was accompanied by his second wife, Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, who wore the mandatory modest black dress and veil which the Vatican requires for wives of dignitaries who meet the pope.

The 20-minute meeting was "cordial," the Vatican said in a statement afterwards.

Prince Charles's accession to the throne was likely to be an unspoken subtext of the meeting, an expert on the prince told CNN.

"The biggest thing on Prince Charles's agenda is the preparation for his coronation," said Christopher Wilson, author of "The Windsor Knot: Charles, Camilla and the Legacy of Diana."

Charles would like the pope to attend personally, unlikely as that may be, given the religious divide between London and Rome, Wilson said.

"He will expect a high-profile Roman Catholic presence in Westminster Abbey," where he will be crowned, Wilson argued. "The combined heads of state come from everywhere. Every democratically elected head of state will be invited. It bigs up your coronation if you can get the highest Roman Catholic to come."

The meeting between prince and pope came days after the 500th anniversary of the crowning of Henry VIII, the English king who broke with the Roman Catholic Church and established the Church of England because he wanted to divorce.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: camilla; charles; popebenedict; princecharles; vatican
I wouldn't count Queen Elizabeth II out just yet. Her Mum lived to 104, and she is only 82.

Prince Charles married Camilla after the death of Diana, so as far as the Anglican Church is concerned, Camilla is his legal, church accepted wife.

1 posted on 04/27/2009 11:46:57 AM PDT by Cincinna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

No - Camilla is divorced herself.


2 posted on 04/27/2009 11:49:56 AM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Cincinna

I wonder if Charles will ascend to the throne.


4 posted on 04/27/2009 11:53:57 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Not sure, but I thought the Anglicans recognized divorce. ilso thought Charles and Camilla were married in church. Since he isn’t Catholic, his divorce would not be a question to concern the Pope.


5 posted on 04/27/2009 11:54:04 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla ("men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters." -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

The only throne Charles will ascend to is the loo.


6 posted on 04/27/2009 11:54:26 AM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

The Queen’s mother lived past 100, at any rate. Unless his mother abdicates, there’s a good chance (and I do mean GOOD) he will never be king.


7 posted on 04/27/2009 12:03:16 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( AR2, Overdue! = American Revolution II...Overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna
If I recall correctly, only reigning CATHOLIC queens may wear white to a papal audience.

I don't know if Camilla is Catholic. That would be embarassing (to her, not the Holy Father).

8 posted on 04/27/2009 12:07:13 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
I don't know if Camilla is Catholic

Not possible. Act of Settlement of 1701

9 posted on 04/27/2009 12:12:57 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Competent small-government conservative = close enough for government work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

Pope to Charles:

You’re still a dope.


10 posted on 04/27/2009 12:20:49 PM PDT by exit82 (The Obama Cabinet: There was more brainpower on Gilligan's Island.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Next time, I'll put up a < sarcasm > flag.

But . . . two words: Maria Fitzherbert.

11 posted on 04/27/2009 12:22:39 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother
But . . . two words: Maria Fitzherbert.

If you know about Mrs. Fitzherbert, you surely know that the marriage was illegal under the Royal Marriages Act 1772. If it hadn't been, Prince George Augustus Frederick would have lost his right to succeed his father as King George IV.
12 posted on 04/27/2009 12:33:12 PM PDT by Cheburashka (Lesson #1 from Battlestar Galactica: Never turn your back on your toaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

In Spain it apparently doesn’t matter if a royal spouse was previously married outside of the Catholic Church and subsequently divorced, as was the case with Princess Letizia, wife of crown prince Felipe.


13 posted on 04/27/2009 12:57:14 PM PDT by Ozone34 ("There are only two philosophies: Thomism and bullshitism!" -Leon Bloy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinna

Hey, at least photographers weren’t banned. Chuck and Camilla got Nancy Pelosi beat.


14 posted on 04/27/2009 12:59:43 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ozone34

I think you are right. I think Letizia’s first marriage didn’t need to be annulled because she was never married in the RC Church.


15 posted on 04/27/2009 4:01:39 PM PDT by Cincinna (TIME TO REBUILD * PALIN * JINDAL * CANTOR 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

You are right, this doesn’t concern the Catholic Church.

Anglicans are permitted to worship and receive Holy Communion if they divorce. They cannot be re-married in Church if their previous spouse is still living.

Not sure about Camilla. I believe Andrew Parker-Bowles is Catholic, but Camilla is not.


16 posted on 04/27/2009 4:04:24 PM PDT by Cincinna (TIME TO REBUILD * PALIN * JINDAL * CANTOR 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Very true. Camilla is only the wife of the heir to throne, the Duchess of Cornwall. They are Anglican,. not Catholic, therefore the Black.


17 posted on 04/27/2009 4:05:49 PM PDT by Cincinna (TIME TO REBUILD * PALIN * JINDAL * CANTOR 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka
True, but under the 1701 Act of Settlement it would have excluded him from the succession (but didn't because of the Royal Marriages Act which invalidated the marriage and superseded the Act of Settlement in that regard.)
18 posted on 04/27/2009 4:56:18 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson