Posted on 05/04/2009 10:00:08 AM PDT by Stayfree
Bingo. The days of a "foolproof" forgery are long gone. Comparative analysis via SEM results will nail such old fashioned attempts to “create” an object 30 – 40 years old or older.
Of course, if little Barry wants to give it a go all he has to do is drop the alleged LF BC on the table and let the real analysis begin.
The supposed 1960 Heidelberger press is a nice touch but where did they get the equipment (and oldtimers who still know how) to shoot the negs (20X24 camera), touch up the pinholes in the negs with opaque, burn the plates, and photoengrave the copper printing plates for the press?
That’s nice.
Wonder if the Republican governor of Hawaii would keep on sitting on her butt and let it happen instead of beating the big O to the punch.
Spot on. How do you like them apples, Warren Buffett?
There must be at least ONE loyal American citizen in Hawaii that can get his/her hands on that piece of paper. Just one. One loyal American. For the good of 300 million others that don’t want to see the greatest nation evaporate into Communisim and all its perils.
Did he really say “illegal”???!!
They’re too busy donating to the President’s campaign funds.
How many mornings do you get this same message in your e-mail? ... You used the same intro the last time (a few days ago) when you (or your team) posted this material.
Or are you just posting a copy of the post that has appeared more than once at FR in the past month?
I’ve only gotten two emails about the BC - one was an april fools hoax (thankfully I asked more questions of the person who sent it to me - I’ve also seen the hoax posted several times since by others.) Then the one this morning about a possible forgery in the making.
Why do you think I have a team? It’s just me.
Printing new ink on new paper off an old press does not an original certificate make.
See my 6 week old tagline. Priceless is right!
The list, ping
Now that’s a good idea. :) Maybe it would end the debate.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2232462/posts?q=1&;page=87
To: All>br> Is the Obama administration working on a forged long-form Birth Certificate as we speak?
by DefendUSx April 19, 2009 10:00
Hat-tip to Probie who gives this information:
Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only reason they haven’t rolled out the foregery yet is that it is “seasoning” under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready....one to two months tops.
I also said they’d have to get a 1960s Printing Press, and indeed, by this information, looks like they found one.
The banking connection is disturbing too, gives more credibility to this also. The details here are solid.
Tags: citizenship, elgibility, Birth Certificate www.repubx.com
87 posted on Monday, April 20, 2009 12:20:21 PM by patriot08
My antennae start tingling when I see the same post repeated word for word by different posters on different threads, on different days, but always related to the same issue without attribution. As you can see, patriot08 attributed the material properly, to repubx.com .
Do you use more than one name at FR?
Is there any paper there to get one’s hands on; of so, wouldn’t it have been leaked by now? On the other hand, HI people are among the world’s most loyal Democrats.
Is she just another example of a useless Republican governor?
Here is some quick thought.
She would have definitely seen that real O birth certificate by now. If, I mean IF, it’s the real thing, meaning O was actually born in Hawaii, then there is really no reason to rattle his cage.
On the other hand, it is very fishy that if O was actually born in Hawaii then why all the nonsense of suppressing it.
Now, if she saw Obama was NOT born in Hawaii and made copies of it, she might have a lot of ammo for future use by keeping her mouth shut for now. Who knows.
It’s not the birth certificate that disqualifies him,
it’s his father (assuming the prevailing narrative about
paternity is in fact true) citizenship at the time of
birth. (A short discussion of this is on IIRC, the
Citizen Wells blog in early December 2008) That said,
I think we are entitled to all transcripts, passports,
financial aid documents etc. etc.
I will definitely be more discriminate in what I put out there from now on. I’m still figuring this site out as far as searching and even leaving tracks back to posts I want to read later.
There’s just one of me - rebeltxrose - temporarily place in NY of all places.
Thank you for being kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.