After Obama's Speech, How Much Would Corporate America Pay to See His Real Birth Certificate?

The Obama Disaster.com ^ | May 4, 2009 | Stayfree

[FreeAtlanta]

If the moron really wanted to help his “fellow Americans”, he would offer tax amnesty for people and corporations to bring their money back to the US tax free to invest in our businesses.

[cycjec]

1. It’s not the certificate (see my previous)
2. He should have shown it long ago, and the delay
makes even the production of the genuine article suspect.
3. I’d welcome input from those with printing expertise.

[cycjec]

Interesting question. I doubt standard corporate law
provides for what shareholder’s recourse is after
a “long train of abuses and usurpations.”

[cycjec]

Regarding difficulties in interfacing (sorry for that word)
with supporters of Israel etc. who voted for BHO:
So do I. I think we are all going to have to do some
deep thinking (and praying) on how to deal with this
even more in the future.

[Polarik]

How, exactly, are they going to get Hawaii’s DOH to be co-conspirators? There will be supoenas calling for them to turn over both their print logs and request logs, as well as an actual copy of Obama’s alleged request for a COLB on June 6,2007.

Regardless of what they try to do here, it will not absolve them of creating a document forgery with the COLB.

Sandra Lines will sniff this out like a bloodhound after a fox.

[MHGinTN]

If a real birth certificate exists in HI for Barry, why float a forgery on the Internet to try and scam the world? And yes, the Internet bilge that even democrap/liberal/illicit judges cite as proof is a forgery/inauthentic/illegitimate/fake/a crafty scam/criminally fraudulent.

[MHGinTN]

You assert as first premise, "She (Governor Lingle) would have definitely seen that real O birth certificate by now." When you start with such a false premise, what can we expect of the rest of your post? The so called/imagined 'real birth certificate' is sealed and to vieww it without authorization from the affirmative action liar-in-chief would be criminal violation of privacy. An honest governor would not violate the law.

[MHGinTN]

Lemme try that with better html:

You assert as first premise, "She (Governor Lingle) would have definitely seen that real O birth certificate by now."

When you start with such a false premise, what can we expect of the rest of your post? The so called/imagined 'real birth certificate' is sealed and to vieww it without authorization from the affirmative action liar-in-chief would be criminal violation of privacy. An honest governor would not violate the law.

[nuss]

Keep swimming, keep swimming, keep swimming......

[nuss]

Oh, the governor and cronies would not hestitate to break the law by viewing the birth certificate....what they wouldn’t do is ever, ever, ever say anything that revealed their crime. That’s why I don’t care whether or not they saw the birth certificate...they wouldn’t dare report what they saw. However, we focus to much on the Hawaiian birth certificate....there are the equally important questions as to whether Barry was Indonesian...and also the issue of whether he can hang his U. S. citizenship on his mother, who was to young at time to establish her offspring’s citizenship as American.....there are many questions that need to be answered, not just the Hawaiian BC.

[naturalborn]

Unfortunately, only five other countries have more economic freedom than we do.

http://www.heritage.org/index/TopTen.aspx

[m4629]

An honest governor would not violate the law.

Dare I submit that is even more of a false premise? :-D