To: m4629
You assert as first premise, "She (Governor Lingle) would have definitely seen that real O birth certificate by now." When you start with such a false premise, what can we expect of the rest of your post? The so called/imagined 'real birth certificate' is sealed and to vieww it without authorization from the affirmative action liar-in-chief would be criminal violation of privacy. An honest governor would not violate the law.
47 posted on
05/04/2009 3:00:12 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: MHGinTN
Lemme try that with better html:
You assert as first premise, "She (Governor Lingle) would have definitely seen that real O birth certificate by now."
When you start with such a false premise, what can we expect of the rest of your post? The so called/imagined 'real birth certificate' is sealed and to vieww it without authorization from the affirmative action liar-in-chief would be criminal violation of privacy. An honest governor would not violate the law.
48 posted on
05/04/2009 3:03:22 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson