One veto? That's the best you can come up with?
By spending just half of TARP 1, Bush showed fiscal restraint.
Excuse me?
Wasteful and unconstitutional spending is flat out wrong, whether it's just one dollar or one trillion dollars.
Bush had to do something.
No, he had to do the right thing: defend and protect the Constitution.
Unfortunately for young'uns like me, he did the wrong thing.
He made a deal with the globalist bankers.
In regard to security, terrorists really did hit US soil on 911. It was the first such attack on US soil since the Civil War. Thousands of lives were lost. Those radical still seek to annihilate our way of life.
As opposed to the hundreds of thousands murdered by illegal aliens because Bush failed to enforce immigration law and protect our borders?
The incursions on our liberty were actually lower than any other war we have fought.
Tell that to this boy.
Oh, and while you're at it, tell us exactly why "fusion centers" are necessary to fight terrorism. You know, justify the Government's need to build and maintain profiles of law-abiding United States citizens using private and public record-gathering and retention capabilities.
The fact that we have not had another attack since then has mislead you to your present mental condition.
Mental condition? What the foo are you smoking?
I simply refuted your points, and you responded with a personal attack...typical of a classless brainwashed Bushbot, eh?
#18
You got to really wonder if Lone-bush-bot is completely imbalanced to post this nonsense. Growth, rising wages, economic growth, tax receipts ?? You really would have to be delusional to think that is what GWB left us with. No one here but Lone-bush-bot posts crazy stuff like this now.
I don’t think facts matter to you. I think attitude does. If facts intersest you:
... improvements from the vetoed bill. Thus, the President’s senior advisors would recommend that he veto this revised bill if it were presented to him in its current form. We ...
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/legislative/sap/106-1/ HR3064-h.html- 7.5KB - Bush Whitehouse
S 1692 — 10/20/99
... 10, 1997, respectively. The President will veto S. 1692 for the reasons he expressed in ... for the reasons he expressed in his veto message of April 10, 1996, which is ...
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/legislative/sap/106-1/ S1692-s.html- 7.0KB - Bush Whitehouse
HR 1122 — 05/14/97
... April 10, 1996. The President will veto H.R. 1122 for the reasons he expressed ... for the reasons he expressed in his veto message of April 10, 1996, which is ...
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/legislative/sap/105-1/ HR1122-s.html- 6.9KB - Bush Whitehouse
S 625 — 11/08/99
... enforce pension law, he will veto it. ... the President indicated that he would veto it. The Administration’s position on ... to S. 625, the President will veto the bill. The ...
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/legislative/sap/106-1/ S625-s.html- 11.0KB - Bush Whitehouse
HR 3660 — 04/03/2000
... 10, 1997, respectively. The President will veto H.R. 3660 for the reasons he expressed ... for the reasons he expressed in his veto messages of April 10, 1996, and October ...
Bush did not make a deal with globalist bankers. In fact, the globalist bankers were in on tanking the US economy for the election. Soros, Buffet, the Dems were all in this group and Bush saved us all from a much worse annihilation of the financial sector.
You are absolutely making stuff up on murders by illegal immigrants. I will leave that one there for now.
The world you fear will come to you now mutliplied. Obama and the Democrats will watch you very closely.
Poliitics is not philosophy. You would do well to see the difference.
I’m sure I was for the Patriot act back when. More government power of any kind doesn’t seem appealing at present. It’s to easy to use it to abuse American citizens.
Puts in perspective I was okay with it with a “Republican” President but knew that if the rats were in charge I probably wouldn’t be keen on it.
They went out of their way to turn “patriot” into an acronym, that seems kinda skeevy.