Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California high court set to rule on gay marriage (Tuesday)
Associated Press ^ | May 22, 2009 | LISA LEFF

Posted on 05/22/2009 2:55:45 PM PDT by Baladas

SAN FRANCISCO -- The California Supreme Court will rule Tuesday on the validity of a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, a decision that will end months of speculation over whether gay couples can resume marrying in the state.

The high court announced the pending opinion on its Web site Friday morning.

Its seven justices are considering a series of lawsuits seeking to overturn Proposition 8 on the grounds that it was put on the ballot improperly. The constitutional amendment approved by voters in November overruled the court's 4-3 ruling from a year ago that briefly legalized same-sex unions.

The court also will decide whether to uphold the marriages of an estimated 18,000 gay couples who wed before Proposition 8 passed with 52 percent of the vote. The election came after a contentious $83 million campaign that made it the most expensive ballot measure on a social issue in the nation's history.

Gay rights advocates have scheduled marches throughout California and in several other states for Tuesday evening. Organizers say the gatherings will be celebratory if the court rules in their favor and angry if Proposition 8 is upheld.

Waiting for the decision "has been an absolutely gut-wrenching experience," said Molly McKay, spokeswoman for Marriage Equality USA.

"As Californians, we are all under tremendous strain worrying about the economy, our jobs and our families," McKay said. "On top of that, gay families have been living for months with the fear that the court will allow a bare majority of voters to strip gay and lesbian families of their constitutional protections and eliminate our marriages - or just as bad, eliminate new couples' ability to get married."

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: cacourts; caglbt; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; marriage; prop8; ruling; scoc
Black robes incoming!!!
1 posted on 05/22/2009 2:55:46 PM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas
It's time for Californians to pass an Amendment to remove judges who oppose the will of the voters...


2 posted on 05/22/2009 2:57:56 PM PDT by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Giving the police time to get the riot gear out, just in case the vote goes against the boys in the band?


3 posted on 05/22/2009 3:07:18 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

C’mon San Andreas fault, work your magic...


4 posted on 05/22/2009 3:10:35 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist ("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Anything resembling a constitutional republic will have been swept under the rug in California if the will of the voters is invalidated by a handful of judges.


5 posted on 05/22/2009 3:12:51 PM PDT by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Unbelievable. How many times is the court in California going to overturn the will of the voters? How long will the voters put up with this thuggery?


6 posted on 05/22/2009 3:14:39 PM PDT by Rocky (OBAMA: Succeeding where bin Laden failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

BOHICA


7 posted on 05/22/2009 3:17:14 PM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
Ahhhh I thought the people of California already decided this issue, and overwhelmingly at that.

Just WTH's going on in that state?
Do the people of CA condone this crap or what?

Unbelievable.

8 posted on 05/22/2009 3:20:19 PM PDT by Landru (Arghh, Liberals are trapped in my colon like spackle or paste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
on the ballot improperly?

I'd like to see an explanation of that.

Was it a trick question? Yes for No—No for Yes

9 posted on 05/22/2009 3:37:58 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The plan... 0 in power for life. At least that's what they told him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Evil requires a continuous fight.


10 posted on 05/22/2009 3:39:33 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (The plan... 0 in power for life. At least that's what they told him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

“Several religious groups that support same-sex marriage also have encouraged their members to block the streets outside the court’s San Francisco headquarters and to participate in other acts of civil disobedience if the decision is disappointing.”

And what good is that going to do, except getting these people’s butts kicked. I’m sure there will be a lot more security around the court than would ever be at a street demonstration of regular people against the homosexual lifestyle.


11 posted on 05/22/2009 4:12:30 PM PDT by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

If they overturn the will of the voters WILL you in CA please make a stink over this and impeach the judges (and even though they may be liberal on spending): PLEASE make a BIG-DEAL over this in BLACK AND LATINO Churches..!

(Drive a wedge)...make it a like the tea parties (but for morality)!!


12 posted on 05/22/2009 4:43:30 PM PDT by JSDude1 (DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

For something to qualify for discrimination it must fit legal requirements. Homosexual marriage is what? Two people of the same sex that want to marry.
Since there are no heterosexuals wanting to marry a same sex partner for whatever reasons marriage gives you, there is no discrimination.


13 posted on 05/22/2009 9:16:41 PM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Is there any doubt what the activitist judges will decide? They have clearly shown in the past, through their actions, that they are a panel of unelected officials who make policy using whatever language gymnastics necessary to justify striking down laws they disagree with.

JoMa


14 posted on 05/23/2009 9:33:05 AM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson