Can anyone here eclipse me in anger?
How do I compare—as a non-Catholic—answering ridiculous statements at my local and very Liberal forum? [Brackets indicate an attempt at clarification for FR viewers.]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Start rant...
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
->You reject my intuitive arguments, ask for links, and you promptly receive them.
->You reject links that have Jewish, Muslim and Christian ties, so Secular links are promptly provided instead.
->Secular links are immediately rejected as "strawmen"!
IT'S APPARENT THAT IT'S NOT ONLY THE CHURCH THAT HAS DOGMA.
->The title comes from this link, where your predatory male homosexual heroes are detailed in the press:
http://www.joshuachildrensfoundation.org/articles/archives/child_abuse/i...
->And NON-religious, NON-secular, Scientific documentation links from here:
http://www.joshuachildrensfoundation.org/10_FactsSexAbuseOfMales.php
->More concerns:
->Segregation was corrected by Congress, NOT the Judiciary. In fact, The Judiciary produced Dred Scott.
->It's not 4.x% [homo- percentage of population]. It may have doubled from 1% to 2% in recent years.
->Nobody here is advocating gang rape for any reason. [to "cure" Lesbianism in South Africa]
->Nobody else is forthcoming on Lesbian aggressions here, and I expect there's a good reason for that.
->Nobody said that to be effeminate is to be a homosexual -- I said exactly the opposite. Born-effeminate males should absolutely be protected from predatory male homosexuals.
->Former Congressman Foley does not show effeminate characteristics: Like the millions of adolescents before him, he was molested as a youth by a predatory male homosexual priest. It's up to millions this month, but only in the European press -- not in the US press.
->As an adult, Foley was empowered to write US statutes to dismiss his predatory male homosexual deviancies by
LEGAL means.
->You write to dismiss predatory male homosexual deviancies -- as correct in your mind by your so-called
MORAL means.
->Nobody grows up a male homosexual because no child could conceive of how to BEGIN the practice of male homosexuality that is to become "protected". They must be introduced to the PRACTICE of homosexuality by predatory male homosexuals -- whom you are defending with DOGMA.
->There's just one reason you don't answer my question "How many women have introduced young males to homosexual behavior?"
->Because the answer is "Zero".
->I doubt you know how the boys are doing, now that THEIR innocence has been robbed by a predatory male homosexual. [Local family ravaged by homosexual assaults on their young]
->"...I would like to know how many are viewing this thread, the adolescent-homo-sitter thread, and the original thread you started on the gaping need for an additional "protected class" of Americans.
->Just how well did those Massachusetts, Iowa and Vermont referenda "Of The People" work out?
->Finally, if you are truly open minded, and totally immune to the homosexual agenda propoganda, tell us how—precisely and exactly—does "a vote on a hotbutton issue"
FAIL?
[And require intervention by the Judiciary]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
End of rant
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How am I doing so far? :)
Could you just explain in plain English what exactly your point of view is? Are you saying that those opposed to gay marriage and homosexuality as a whole are bigots?