Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Are the SK’s gonna join the fight or is this one all ours?


4 posted on 05/28/2009 5:37:58 PM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: randog
Are the SK’s gonna join the fight or is this one all ours?

From what I'm reading, the SK's, who's children have been indoctrinated as badly as dumb American kids with commie BS, will have an experience similar to being tossed in a blender set to frappe. After NK blow's it's load in the first 10 minutes of combat, conditions will gradually improve from there.

However, a valuable lesson will have been learned by all...

Seriously, I hope it doesn't come down to that.

Prayers that it doesn't.

40 posted on 05/28/2009 6:01:23 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: randog

SK would fight.


45 posted on 05/28/2009 6:06:06 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: randog
They (the south I mean) have an army of half a million men, we have a tenth of that there on the ground. But we'd ramp to match them within 3 to 6 months.
51 posted on 05/28/2009 6:08:37 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: randog

Considering that the SK’s have 600,000+ under arms, and we only have a token force of about 25,000, the SK’s wouldn’t have a choice but to fight. Additionally, we already have sizable forces deployed and/or in the field in Iraq and Afghanistan. While their skills and excellence in battle are without question, they have been spread too thin for too long. Another major conflagration might bring our forces to the logistical breaking point — if not to a psychological one.

Also, in any reopening to the Korean Conflict, NK would immediately go for Seoul. It’s close, and even if their conventional forces couldn’t reach it via invasion, they could and very probably would attack it immediately with a major missile barrage — perhaps even a nuke or two. They would figure they have little to lose at that point. And, Kim and all the important NK’s would be deep underground in bunkers they’ve had 50+ years to build.

Then, we have to consider WHO would be our Commander-in-Chief. Barack Obama has no military experience, and he does not philosophically agree with “war,” nor does he generally see it as a necessity. Believing that he is capable of fixing any problem through diplomacy by deploying his irresistible charm and personal self assurance might work on weak-kneed Republican’s in Washington, but Kim Jong-Il (not to mention Mahmoud Ahmadenijad, Hugo Chavez, and Fidel Castro just to name a few) would eat him for breakfast.

Frankly, though, what bothers me more is the (tin foil hat alert) possibility that tying up our military forces overseas in engagements is part of the agenda. Tie up your forces dealing with numerous foreign battles in different locations — and viola! this produces the need for a domestic Civilian National Security Force! And of course, during wartime with ALL the domestic, economic and foreign crises, well, it’s time for the ACORN stormtroopers to “oversee” security and “detain” those suspected of anti-government activities.... A stretch? Hmmmm....

Finally, if Korea explodes into war, and with us already tied down in Iraq & Afghanistan, where’s the next domino to fall? Which despot will try to grab what he wants while we are “distracted?” Would Iran up the ante via it’s Lebanese based proxy Hezbollah, attacking Israel? Would they make a move against our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf? How about the Central/South American option? Would Cuba and Venezuela, via their proxies attempt to grab weak democracies through insurgencies or invasions? Could they destablize the already weak Mexico? Would Russia go after Georgia again — or the Ukraine? Or would China finally attempt to retake Taiwan, whom we’ve promised to defend should that eventuality occur?

The Korean situation could very easily bring about a downward spiral into global chaos, given the current economic and foreign relations crises at present. The steady hand of a principled leader who trusts in something larger than himself would be welcome. But we don’t have that. We are indeed more vulnerable and endangered than at any other point in my lifetime — including the Cold War.


73 posted on 05/28/2009 6:25:33 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: randog

The ROK’s are fully capable of holding their own against the NPRK’s. they have the weapons and the doctrine. It would be very, very bloody.


112 posted on 05/28/2009 7:07:02 PM PDT by Pistolshot (The Soap-box, The Ballot-box, The Jury-box, And The Cartridge-Box ...we are past 2 of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson