“No single nation should pick and choose which nations should hold nuclear weapons,”
I was not aware of that little tidbit. 0bama sure isn’t that bright, not that he writes his own speeches regardless...
It is not “one single nation” that opposes Iranian nuclear weapons, but 0bama’s favorite, the UN.
When combined with his other nuclear/military blind spots, it’s quite disturbing:
“We will not weaponize space.”
We already have military systems in space, and space-capable weapons. Further, our enemies are developing space weapons - are we to simply ignore the threat? Naive once again.
“I will work towards a world with no nuclear weapons.”
That would accomplish several things. First of all, America will continue to relinquish a capability which every other nation greatly respects. Second, as the stockpiles reach lower and lower levels, at some point nuclear war becomes thinkable again. Third (if we get this far), once nuclear weapons are gone, large scale conventional war becomes thinkable again. World War III anyone?
Dangerously irresponsible, and naive. What we actually need is a nuclear weapons modernization program, including a functioning breeder reactor and the production of new plutonium pits.
Overall, 0bama represents a multifaceted threat to a stable, prosperous America. Wake up everyone!
I am not sure he wasn't referring to Israel as opposing Iranian nukes.