1 posted on
07/02/2009 1:25:38 PM PDT by
yongin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: yongin
2 posted on
07/02/2009 1:27:42 PM PDT by
joejm65
To: yongin
If the old saying, “you are over the target if you are taking flack” is accurate and Palin was a bomber formation, the Nazis just lost the biggest ball bearing plant this week...
3 posted on
07/02/2009 1:28:45 PM PDT by
ejonesie22
(Mitt Romney is a more subtle version of Arlen Specter with better hair...)
To: yongin
I’m supposed to care what that twit David Frum thinks?
4 posted on
07/02/2009 1:28:51 PM PDT by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
To: yongin
"The McCain campaign is over. The duty of confidentiality has expired. "Therefore, the Romney bootlickers who are behind these anonymous attacks should be man enough to reveal themselves and their sponsor.
5 posted on
07/02/2009 1:29:17 PM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("Shouldn't there be equal time for our Bill of Responsibilities?" -- Justice Clarence Thomas)
To: yongin
6 posted on
07/02/2009 1:29:18 PM PDT by
pgkdan
( I miss Ronald Reagan!)
To: yongin
Man I thought that this was a PICS thread ;-(!
To: yongin
"In the mysterious soup of motives that sustains her supporters, enthusiasm for effective governance does not seem a very major ingredient." WTF?
Palin ain't running deficits and she is increasing the US natural gas supply by 8% while creating real jobs in the process.
8 posted on
07/02/2009 1:30:33 PM PDT by
avacado
To: yongin
I don’t hate David Frum because of his ideas, which suck, but which he is entitled to— I hate him because he’s a jerk. Honestly he is second only to Andrew Sullivan in bashing Sarah Palin every single chance he gets. This moron thinks he can build his “New Majority” by attacking Rush and Sarah Palin? He speaks of “moderation” and “modernity” and but uses HuffPo ad-hominem tactics.
11 posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:36 PM PDT by
exist
To: yongin
Who stands to gain from the continued onslaught of Sarah Palin? None other that Mitt Romney and Mark Huckabee.
12 posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:41 PM PDT by
TommyDale
(Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
To: yongin
Yawn. The Neo-Liberal David Frumpy tries yet again to destroy Sarah Palin.
Everyone has faults, but McCain is the co-author of American disaster -- along with his other neocon buddy Bush.
Sarah Palin's real problem is that she looks to the neos like someone they can't control - and that terrifies them.
13 posted on
07/02/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT by
Regulator
(Welcome to Zimbabwe! Now hand over your property)
To: yongin
I’m not onboard the Palin for 2012 campaign, but I’m absolutely against Frum, McCain, or Romney.
16 posted on
07/02/2009 1:33:44 PM PDT by
Darren McCarty
(We do what we have to do.)
To: yongin
"In the mysterious soup of motives that sustains her supporters, enthusiasm for effective governance does not seem a very major ingredient."
Ever read C.S. Lewis' That Hideous Strength?
Young Mr. Studdock is employed to write articles for newspapers explaining everything... making the news, forming the nation's opinion for the unwitting masses.
This article (and many, many like them) ring of ideological control of newspapers. Articles intended to "say it enough times and it will be true". This really is sad. And Lewis saw it in the '40's.
To: yongin
If any of this is true, why not put their name on it??? Most of it is just opinionated Bull Shit.
18 posted on
07/02/2009 1:34:30 PM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: yongin
WHATEVER! Palin is heads and tails above any of republocant. All these whiners can go suck an egg.
20 posted on
07/02/2009 1:35:01 PM PDT by
vpintheak
(Like a muddied spring or a polluted well is a righteous man who gives way to the wicked. Prov. 25:26)
To: yongin
Item: David I thought you were merely a “useful idiot” of the left. It turns out you are just a useless idiot.
21 posted on
07/02/2009 1:35:24 PM PDT by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: yongin
ITEM: A year ago, 80 percent of Alaskans viewed Palin very favorably or somewhat favorably; by this spring, just 55 percent had a positive opinion.
I'm sure that a years worth of the press going for her jugular had nothing to do with that.....
by the way what is Obama's ratings today anyway?
22 posted on
07/02/2009 1:35:49 PM PDT by
usmcobra
(Your chances of dying in bed are reduced by getting out of it, but most people still die in bed)
To: yongin
ITEM: More than once in my travels in Alaska, people brought up, without prompting, the question of Palins extravagant self-regard. Several told me, independently of one another, that they had consulted the definition of narcissistic personality disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disordersa pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathyand thought it fit her perfectly.So she'd be another Bill Clinton, is that what he's saying?
24 posted on
07/02/2009 1:35:59 PM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
To: yongin
“In the mysterious soup of motives that sustains her supporters...”
Yes, because wanting a candidate with unambiguous positions, experience with domestic energy production, and the toughness to give as good as she gets is just SO hard to fathom.
“...enthusiasm for effective governance does not seem a very major ingredient.”
Bollocks. Just bollocks (and not the dog’s bollocks, either).
26 posted on
07/02/2009 1:36:45 PM PDT by
DemforBush
(Somebody wake me when sanity has returned to the nation.)
To: yongin
Several told me, independently of one another, that they had consulted the definition of narcissistic personality disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disordersa pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathyand thought it fit her perfectly.Gee...which photo below truly shows those traits???? LOL
Or.....
28 posted on
07/02/2009 1:37:45 PM PDT by
2nd amendment mama
( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
To: yongin
Frum doesn’t like Sarah, or Rush L. for that matter, but thinks 0 is `man-candy’.
http://barelyablog.com/?p=5697
Heres Frum juxtaposing Obama to Limbaugh ...
On the one side, the president of the United States: soft-spoken and conciliatory, never angry, always invoking the recession and its victims. This president invokes the language of responsibility, and in his own life seems to epitomize that ideal: He is physically honed and disciplined, his worst vice an occasional cigarette. He is at the same time an apparently devoted husband and father. Unsurprisingly, women voters trust and admire him.
“Neo-con”=limp liberal
29 posted on
07/02/2009 1:38:00 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(*#!% you and the pony you rode in on, Dave)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson