To: steelyourfaith
2 posted on
07/10/2009 11:40:50 AM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: WhiteCastle
Thus the term “coal powered” for an electric car...
This is not news to any thinking person...
3 posted on
07/10/2009 11:41:07 AM PDT by
ltc8k6
To: WhiteCastle
What? Nonsense. Doesn’t electricity just magically come out of the wall?
4 posted on
07/10/2009 11:42:02 AM PDT by
Zeddicus
To: WhiteCastle
To: WhiteCastle
Can someone post Captain Obvious?
Geez FR has been saying this for years.
6 posted on
07/10/2009 11:44:16 AM PDT by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: WhiteCastle
I’ve said this before......why trade big oil for monopolistic electricity?
7 posted on
07/10/2009 11:44:22 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: WhiteCastle
Unless they take the chains off building clean nukes...
8 posted on
07/10/2009 11:44:29 AM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: WhiteCastle
WE DO NOT HAVE ELECTRIC CARS AVAILABLE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC. STOP SELLING SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T EXIST.
And we're not going to buy some over priced tin can when it does come about.
To: WhiteCastle
The solution is more nuclear power. While the U.S. has been hamstrung by environmental radicals and their pawns in Congress, the rest of the world has surged ahead in this field. The Japanese sell a portable reactor the size of an 18-wheeler for small communities. It can be shipped to the site in one piece, operate with little maintenance for years, then removed and replaced. The old unit is shipped back to Japan for decontamination.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Toshiba’s_Home_Nuclear_Fusion_Reactor
10 posted on
07/10/2009 11:49:21 AM PDT by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: WhiteCastle
The push for conversion to plug-in electric cars will do nothing to stop carbon emissions, a report by the GAO warns, throwing cold water on a push by Democrats to get more plug-ins on the road. In fact, the problem could be made worse as demand goes up at coal-fired electrical plants. Plus, the need for batteries may just have the US changing the dictators to which were chained, as IBD reports...Oh what a bunch of Claptrap.
1) Even thought he EPA says it's not. Carbon Dioxide is a natural gas consumed by plants and photo plankton, which in turn gives us Oxygen. This cycle has been going on for thousands of years and no one has proven it is broken.
2) Electricity can be produced by Hydroelectric, Solar and Wind power easily. None of these requires a power plant, but those that do are very convenient.
3) Battery efficiency is increasing at a great rate and the newer technologies will make it possible to store more power than ever before.
4) Cap and Trade will probably Tax your car in the near future.
Given all of this, do you thing the Government (GAO) should tell the car companies Not to make Electric Cars??
12 posted on
07/10/2009 11:55:18 AM PDT by
sr4402
To: WhiteCastle; All
"GAO: Electric Cars Won't Reduce Carbon Emissions"
16 posted on
07/10/2009 12:00:51 PM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see a REAL C.O.L.B. BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: WhiteCastle
Where do all of these liberal loons think the energy is coming from? Heaven? Wait....they don’t believe in that.
19 posted on
07/10/2009 12:07:54 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
To: WhiteCastle
"We would most likely have to do business with Hugo Chavez lackey Evo Morales of Bolivia, where half of the worlds proven stores of lithium reside. Even if we didnt buy directly from the leftist leader, Morales has the ability to set the global price just as Saudi Arabia and OPEC do with oil."That should put a damper on enthusiasm for Lithium batteries.
I agree whole heartedly with IBD's call for Nuclear power.
Don't rule out hydrogen as an alternative for Lithium batteries. Hydrogen wouldn't be dependent on any other country. And either Hydrogen or non-lithium batteries could provide us the energy independence we need to keep the next oil price shock from derailing our economy again.
20 posted on
07/10/2009 12:10:53 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: WhiteCastle
As though the radical left really cares!
22 posted on
07/10/2009 12:14:52 PM PDT by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: WhiteCastle
Where are we going to dispose of all of these monster worn out batteries?
What’s the environmental impact of this disposal?
Has there been comprehensive studies on the subject?
23 posted on
07/10/2009 12:15:47 PM PDT by
Gator113
(I live in "one of the largest Muslim countries in the world." Imam Obama told me so.)
To: WhiteCastle
I would be proud to drive a car powered by domestic coal.
And remember, CO2 produced by American coal does not cause global warming.
25 posted on
07/10/2009 12:18:18 PM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: WhiteCastle
GAO: Electric Cars Won't Reduce Carbon EmissionsGee, what a surprise.
27 posted on
07/10/2009 12:20:17 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: WhiteCastle
In fact, the problem could be made worse as demand goes up at coal-fired electrical plants.Why else do you think they're pushing "cap & trade?" They want to make the cost of coal-fired electricity impossibly high just as demand spikes due to plug-in hybrids, so that they can funnel money to their cronies in wind and solar.
38 posted on
07/10/2009 12:58:42 PM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson