Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't know who's worse, the Democrats, the presstitutes or the RINOs as far as sliming her. They're all playing with fire, IMO.
1 posted on 07/12/2009 12:28:52 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Palin is the only true conservative who has any reasonable chance at becoming President any time soon. That fully and completely explains the reaction she elicits from anti-conservatives.


2 posted on 07/12/2009 12:33:21 AM PDT by sourcery (Obama Lied. The Economy Died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The chattering classes are spending a tremendous amount of energy arguing that she’s not worth the energy. . .

You can smell the fear.


3 posted on 07/12/2009 12:40:30 AM PDT by ziravan (FReeper for Congress: www.TimothyDelasandro.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Give em hell Sarah !


4 posted on 07/12/2009 12:44:24 AM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’d say Tony has put them all in the black.
( Note: a target metaphore, no racial inference
suggested. Author)

“Well, I’m not so sure that being an incumbent is an advantage if the world seems to be going to hell and government is seen to be at least part of the cause for that journey. And though many conventional politicians might be seen as quitters if they resigned their offices, I have a very strong hunch that Sarah Palin is constitutionally incapable of being seen as a quitter. Because she is not. She constantly is taking on the biggest challenge on her horizon.

Now, I am not endorsing her, predicting she will run, or predicting she is likely to win if she runs. Let’s wait a couple of years before getting to those questions. If President Obama is seen by the public to be a great success as president in 2012, he probably will be re-elected.

But if he is not seen as a great success, the public may be looking for a straight-talking candidate from the heartland who calls for and truly believes in limited government, maximum personal freedom and fiscal responsibility.

People may be listening for someone who knows how to talk to them rather than at them or down to them.

They also may respond favorably to a candidate who does not respond favorably to the Washington political class — nor it to her.”

At the stage we are in, someone who appears part of the problem ie;government is not the solution.

Go Sarah.

Fire in the belly?
You bet’ya.


8 posted on 07/12/2009 1:22:23 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

All I can say is...

Go Sarah! :)

You’ve got my absentee vote!:)


10 posted on 07/12/2009 2:25:25 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (my former tagline "We can, and we will prevail" doesn't fit with the usurper's goals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Thus, an intriguing part of the Sarah Palin phenomenon is the intensity of response to her every word and move -- from both Republican Party and Democratic Party professionals and from the conventional media. The negative but sustained passion being expressed by the professional Washington political class against her tends to belie its almost unanimous assertion that she is washed up.

The fear and superstition demonstrated by the press, pundits, and the paid thugs and character assassins remind me of the historical times that occurred before the civil war. People were so afraid of a general uprising by the slaves that they overreacted with murderous intent over and over again.

I would vote for Sarah Palin in a heartbeat.

14 posted on 07/12/2009 3:50:57 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Saving for later.....


15 posted on 07/12/2009 4:52:20 AM PDT by Howie66 (The one redeeming thing about liberals: their tendency to kill their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The reaction to Palin’s announcement gives proof to the contention that there is some kind of virus inside The Beltway which infects the brains of those who live there for more than a few years.


16 posted on 07/12/2009 4:59:41 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Big government more or less guarantees rule by creeps and misfits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah Palin is light shedding on all (Dems, RINOs, etc.) who are lying to us for their own power, glory and money. Hopefully, that will be the light illuminating the truth thus enabling the rest of us to focus our energies in order to effect some serious changes in the ranks of our elected officials. I’m sadly of the opinion that it may be too late by 2012. We’ve got to clearly make the case and make those serious changes in 2010. Even if she runs for no office, her voice and her words will bring clarity if she is allowed to speak. The opposition’s defense, as usual, will be to “change the subject” from her message to her so-called behavior, which is the first tactic of all evil doers. “Obfuscation” will be their theme.


19 posted on 07/12/2009 5:16:37 AM PDT by TrueFact
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Ever since she appeared on the scene, I’ve been trying to get a grasp of Sarah’s thinking. I like what I have discerned. She has a solid view of reality and is comfortable with her place in it. She believes in God. She believes that God is personally involved in our lives and that He opens and closes doors.

I think that is where she gets her obvious courage, and that is what makes her smarter and stronger than the inwardly empty chatterers who assail her.


20 posted on 07/12/2009 5:45:28 AM PDT by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Sally Quinns, Maureen Dowds, and Peggy Noonans are pathetic in their criticism of Palin. Neither has truly accomplished anything that approaches the real-world achievements of Sarah Palin. They are exposing their inner selves in the most unattractive manner.

As I posted on another thread about the hit piece Noonan has in the WSJ, quoting:

"What she is, is a seemingly very nice middle-class girl with ambition, appetite and no sense of personal limits." So said Noonan of Palin!

In making such a sweeping judgments of a woman who actually has done something, as opposed to just writing about things, makes their judgments simply irrelevant.

Noonan, in retrospect, like a chameleon, may have absorbed the glow of Reagan, heard his ideas which he so clearly expressed, and was able to put them to paper in such a manner that she accumulated an overblown resume--one which has followed her till today.

She has overstepped her own "personal limits" in her analysis of Palin, the millions of Americans who understand Palin well, and in where her small mind believes Palin will be in the future. By so doing, she has revealed things about herself which she may not have intended.

In Laura Ingraham's interview with Quinn on Oreilly this week, Quinn did the same thing. Her pettiness and irrational conclusions simply revealed her own bias.

22 posted on 07/12/2009 7:52:28 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bump


23 posted on 07/12/2009 8:52:27 AM PDT by Christian4Bush (The difference between Lincoln and Obama: Lincoln freed slaves. Obama is out to make them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The thing is, they’ve been so vicious to Sarah and her family that she is now fairly well insulated. What else can they say? It’s all old news now, including the fact that the media is willing to say or do anything to try to bring her down.

They did the same to President Reagan, and, it afforded HIM the same protection. “Teflon President” was originally a frustrated ridicule that they couldn’t make any of their inane antics stick.

Come campaign for me, SARAH! We love you in TEXAS! Besides, my mom made me promise that I’d introduce her to you, if I get the chance . . .


25 posted on 07/12/2009 12:13:03 PM PDT by ziravan (FReeper for Congress: www.TimothyDelasandro.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Excellent, Tony!


26 posted on 07/12/2009 4:57:58 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Good riddance, UAW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson