Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: giotto

I went back and re-measured around the bones of the ankle (one on each side...) and got a measurement of 9” this time....I guess we’re “below average”...LOL.


18 posted on 07/22/2009 8:43:07 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Abort the Obama Presidency, now!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: goodnesswins

I guess so. I’ve got my share of problems, but fortunately cankles is not one of them.


19 posted on 07/22/2009 9:03:02 PM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: goodnesswins

I went back and re-measured around the bones of the ankle (one on each side...) and got a measurement of 9” this time....I guess we’re “below average”...LOL. <<<<<<<<<

Nah, I’m going for the smallest part, still a little over 9” there, oh, the horror! We need a more precise cankle measuring point. Don’t these people who write such articles know that the women readers were retrieving their tape measures at once? This must be a fairly new thing, as I don’t recall a gym ever taking a “before” measurement of the cankle area, they usually stopped at the calf.


22 posted on 07/22/2009 9:50:11 PM PDT by Mjaye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson