Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?
American Thinker ^ | July 23, 2009 | James Lewis

Posted on 07/23/2009 12:29:02 PM PDT by yoe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: yoe

Put him on the neo-welfare state. His vast wealth was unearned and he’s opposed private savings accounts as a means to pay for private medical care.

Hoist him on his own petard.


21 posted on 07/23/2009 1:04:07 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tips up

Yeah but this one votes the way The Party demands. Of course he HAS slipped up on an abortion vote before and his staff had to make the correction for him.

It is disgusting that so many brain addled Democrats (including Robert Byrd who is in ascendency for the Presidency’s line of succession) as still exercising control over our lives (they don’t serve, they dictate).


22 posted on 07/23/2009 1:05:59 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

RE: ““One Senator with good spirit and cojones could stop this by placing a hold and going public - demanding that all Congress and gummint employees MUST be included......the support from American Citizens would be overwhelming!”

**

You said: “I concur. All federal employees -— and their immediate family -— should not be permitted to have any other care other than ObamaCare.”

***

Yes! I contacted Pelosi’s DC office yesterday with the SAME message. We all need to blast reps with the news that we will NOT stand for any Obamacare plans that THEY, too, don’t participate in — either we ALL suffer under it or NONE of us do! And that includes the Zero family!


23 posted on 07/23/2009 1:06:34 PM PDT by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yoe

We need to make sure that this bill dies, before Teddy passed this vale of tears, just like he let Mary Jo die.


24 posted on 07/23/2009 1:07:22 PM PDT by JRochelle ("I wasn't briefed about the briefing, I was only informed." SanFranNan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaCon

Speaking of which, get the federal workers UNDER Socialist Insecurity instead of their “private” retirement plan.


25 posted on 07/23/2009 1:08:33 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: evets

Give his the Red Pill its cheaper


26 posted on 07/23/2009 1:09:41 PM PDT by ncfool (The GEORGE BUSH revolution has finally arrived in Iran! Where is Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68
One Senator with good spirit and cojones could stop this by placing a hold and going public - demanding that all Congress and gummint employees MUST be included......the support from American Citizens would be overwhelming!

Think they'd give up a perk like that and doom their families to shoddy treatment from the State?

27 posted on 07/23/2009 1:09:50 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Let’s ask Mary Jo.

If she agrees YES, then so be it.


28 posted on 07/23/2009 1:13:21 PM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Any federal worker hired since 1984 (25 years ago) is under social security. Don’t read much, do you?


29 posted on 07/23/2009 1:23:10 PM PDT by In Maryland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: In Maryland; a fool in paradise

I think you chumped YOURSELF wrt fool’s play on words, LOL


30 posted on 07/23/2009 1:29:34 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68 (CALL CONGRESSCRITTERS TOLL-FREE @ 1-800-965-4701)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: In Maryland

Not having worked for The State, I am not intimately knowledgable of it. I do know that I’ve read from people who spent their lives working in the public sector who won’t work for private industry and compromise their retirement.

I know there are pensions that pay upwards of 90% of annual salary.

But I am also refering to their rejection of getting under Social Security. I go by their own statements. Perhaps these are older workers since they may be less likely to retire in 2009 if they started in 1989.


31 posted on 07/23/2009 1:33:16 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

You don’t need to have worked for the state to be aware of the 1983 social security reforms of the Greenspan commission - they are discussed in lots and lots of books. And by the way, the Greenspan Commission moved federal workers into social security to (temporarily) shore up the SS trust fund.

No federal pension pays 90% of annual salary, unless there is something special for the president or congress. You are simply wrong.

Actually your original play on words is the opposite of the truth - the old federal system is more insecure than the Social Security system. The old Civil Service Retirement system is a giant unfunded liability. When given the chance I GLADLY switched to SS. As I said to my wife at the time “When SS runs out of money at the same time as the old federal pension system, which do you think is going to be first in line with the politicians? You think they will fight SS receipients to pay federal pensions? Please!”


32 posted on 07/23/2009 1:55:14 PM PDT by In Maryland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: In Maryland

I said public sector when I made the 90% claim which is what seemed to briefly be the rate when many city employees opted to grab it while they could in Houston.

I appreciate the correction to the above statement but I my intent wasn’t to hijack this thread.


33 posted on 07/23/2009 1:59:51 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Then back to Kennedy ... enough of the talk of sending him to sea! I eat seafood, and would rather not have it contaminated, thank you very much!


34 posted on 07/23/2009 2:09:47 PM PDT by In Maryland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: yoe

In a sane and fair world he would just now be coming up for a parole hearing for the negligent homicide of Mary Jo Kopechne.


35 posted on 07/23/2009 2:23:38 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Komrade Obie says: "This is not your Father's America!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Does Ted Kennedy deserve his extended cancer care?

No! Give him 0bamaCare!

36 posted on 07/23/2009 2:58:59 PM PDT by Sarajevo (You jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

What about military? They are on the federal payroll as well.


37 posted on 07/23/2009 3:10:29 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

I thought about exempting them, but it’s a political point, not a policy point, so keep it simple.

And, it’s great, isn’t it? Don’t we want the BEST for the military?!@


38 posted on 07/23/2009 3:12:33 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: yoe

Chappaquidick episode makes him excempt........sar


39 posted on 07/23/2009 3:43:18 PM PDT by sbark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

This is an excellent article. Obama should publicly ask Kennedy to resist further care and take one for the team. His death by selfless health care rationing should motivate us all to force the same thing on everyone.


40 posted on 07/23/2009 4:11:28 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson