Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheap Nikons on eBay: 22 stolen from NYC red light cameras
Endgadget ^ | 7.27.09 | Tim Stevens

Posted on 07/28/2009 8:34:40 AM PDT by libh8er

Hopefully you're not the sort to risk things by gunning it when the light turns yellow, pushing your (and our) luck, saving yourself a few seconds on the race to the next intersection, and sneering red light cameras. Maybe if you knew the kind of hardware in there you'd have more respect: Nikon's D2X digital SLR. We had no idea there were pro-level shooters in there, but a New York City couple certainly did, running around the city with a cherry picker and pilfering 22 of the things, all sold at pawn shops for a total of $88,000 $6,600 -- money that was promptly spent to further their heroin habit. These two channel swimmers, 45-year-old Anthony Cintorrino and 29-year-old Tara LaBurt, got away with this for a full month before the authorities finally caught up with them. When they were approached they said they were with the DoT... then promptly started running. They didn't get far. Crime doesn't pay, folks, even if it's for a sweet body like that.

Update: The cameras were worth $88,000, but the couple pawned them off for a measly $300 apiece, netting a total of under seven grand. That's a crying shame


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: contraband; d2x; ebay; nikon; nyc; redlightcameras; revenuetickets; theft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/28/2009 8:34:40 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: libh8er

2 posted on 07/28/2009 8:35:06 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

I like at least seeing the sign posted at the traffic light. In my city, they are around 100 feet before the intersection, on the curb side, sometimes behind a tree.

And they will now ticket you for making a right on red. Sometimes.


3 posted on 07/28/2009 8:37:38 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Things that make you go ‘Hmmmmmmmmmm’


4 posted on 07/28/2009 8:38:26 AM PDT by Noumenon (Work that AQT - turn ammunition into skill. No tyrant can maintain a 300 yard perimeter forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
And they will now ticket you for making a right on red. Sometimes.

Especially if you do so without coming to a complete stop.

5 posted on 07/28/2009 8:43:08 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
And they will now ticket you for making a right on red.

In our town they do at many intersections. Of course they've put some big "No Right on Red" signs out. They are generally in common U-Turn intersections and a lot of accidents happen when someone turns right on red while the left turn parallel to them was doing a U-Turn (one happened right in front of me the other day.)

6 posted on 07/28/2009 8:43:40 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Is there no decency anymore? The thought of one thief stealing form another thief... -s-


7 posted on 07/28/2009 8:48:53 AM PDT by Clay Moore (Obama: A good example of why stupid people shouldn't vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

8 posted on 07/28/2009 8:49:36 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

And the taxpayers of NYC aren’t upset that the city spent four grand each on these things. Could do the same thing with a lesser model at less than half the price.


9 posted on 07/28/2009 8:50:23 AM PDT by CTOCS (Some people drink from the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

Some interesections with red light cameras have a cut away lane on the right with a yield (but not stop) sign. What to do, what to do...


10 posted on 07/28/2009 8:51:43 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: libh8er
Come on, it's all about $afety...right?
11 posted on 07/28/2009 8:56:45 AM PDT by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CTOCS
Could do the same thing with a lesser model at less than half the price.

To be fair, lesser models won't do. You need a rock solid autofocus system that can accurately focus track a speeding vehicle. That's available only on the high end (professional) models from Nikon and Canon. But to the govt it's not a big deal. If 22 were stolen, they will order 22 more. And if those get stolen too then another 22...

12 posted on 07/28/2009 8:58:47 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CTOCS
Why be upset about the price of the cameras? Just raise taxes a bit higher to buy these cameras which help raise revenues further.

See, it's Tax Dollars Well Spent™ because it will earn back for Government more than Government originally took from you!

It's a win-win for Government on both sides; what's the problem?

/sarc

13 posted on 07/28/2009 8:59:27 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier
it will earn back for Government more than Government originally took from you

It's a zero cost investment with high yield. They took from you, so they can take from you even more.

14 posted on 07/28/2009 9:07:12 AM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AreaMan
After a protracted legal fight, Red Light Cameras got pulled from my locality. It was on a technicality, but I'll take it.

The fines levied were *civil* fines. 90% of all civil fines (by law) needed to go to the school system. After the Red Light Camera Company got their skimoff, I mean admin fee ($35 out of every $50 fine) ....there wasn't enough to satisfy the school system requirements.

So....rather than have the localities make up the difference to the schools, the City Councils just had the cameras pulled entirely.

Thus proving that it WAS all about money after all, and that safety had nothing to do with it.

15 posted on 07/28/2009 9:11:07 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

They wouldn’t use autofocus. The cameras would have the lens locked at a certain focus point. They would use the professional bodies for their long life and networking abilities.

At least some heroin addicts found something to steal that no one will complain about.


16 posted on 07/28/2009 9:13:03 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

Government always has to have the best.


17 posted on 07/28/2009 9:16:33 AM PDT by Fido969 ("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; libh8er
Yes, WE are watching you!

" Photo from Google Earth"

18 posted on 07/28/2009 9:20:12 AM PDT by WVKayaker (God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.-D.Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clay Moore
Is there no decency anymore? The thought of one thief stealing form another thief... -s-

Maybe someone will do a public service by painting targets on these things. A .22 caliber should be enough to trash one of these cameras without endangering the public.

19 posted on 07/28/2009 9:21:22 AM PDT by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

EXACTLY! I mean, who can be against these things? It’s FREE MONEY for the Government! LOL


20 posted on 07/28/2009 10:55:50 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson