Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
The evidence continues to accumulate that the CIA, and now the entire intelligence superstructure overlaid over the CIA, is infested with a fifth column, rabidly anti-Bush, committed against the war in Iraq, undoubtedly far leftists in origin, and of unknown (to the public at least) dimensions.

As the author points out, this corruption by the left of our intelligence system poses a real and direct threat to the security of the nation. Coming as it does at a time of war against international terrorism the corruption of the intelligence apparatus is especially dangerous because, ultimately, intelligence is our most indispensable weapon in that war for survival.

This case illustrates that we are dealing with the possibility of a nuclear attack in America and intelligence is our only real line of defense.

In a way, the flap between Nancy Pelosi and the CIA is very disquieting because it suggests that the rogue elements in the intelligence community are out of control of even an extreme leftist elitist in power like Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House. One can understand rogue elements operating in partisan service of the Speaker to damage Bush and get a Democrat into the White House. But her problem with the CIA suggests that something deeper and broader and more sinister might be going on.

Whatever is going on, it is absolutely vital that Republicans take over one house or the other of Congress in the next midterm election because there is no hope of any investigation under our current one-party rule. I believe that Obama is a Manchurian Marxist and a very, very dangerous man in a position which, if you were to act in league with rogue elements in the intelligence community, could do infinite damage.

I have posted many times my belief that if Barack Obama is challenged at the root of his power, he will not act like Jimmy Carter, he will act like any tyrant of the left and he certainly will not shrink from waging war to protect his power. Therefore, I believe that America is much more likely to get into a serious war under Barack Obama than is commonly assumed. The man is not a Jimmy Carter, he is a Hugo Chavez.


4 posted on 07/29/2009 1:19:07 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford
The man is not a Jimmy Carter, he is a Hugo Chavez.

Excellent analysis, I could not agree more. I used this same line in attempts to get others to use their minds and not their emotions in voting. My efforts fell flat. Most have no knowledge of history.

A dumbed-down electorate is dangerous to liberty.

5 posted on 07/29/2009 1:32:24 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

President Bush should have put John Bolton in charge of cleaning out the CIA nest.


15 posted on 07/29/2009 4:36:22 AM PDT by listenhillary (90% of our problems could be resolved with a government 10% of the size it is now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson