Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homicide Bombers Kill at Least 15 in Crowded Cafe in Northwest Iraq
Fox News ^ | 08/13/2009 | Foxnews

Posted on 08/13/2009 10:21:47 AM PDT by fiscon1

Two homicide bombers killed at least 15 people and wounded 20 more in northern Iraq on Thursday, police said.

The coordinated attack took place in a crowded cafe in Sinjar, a city 240 miles northwest of the capital Baghdad, according to Reuters.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: gwot; homicidebombers; iraq; iraqiterrorism; warcrime

1 posted on 08/13/2009 10:21:49 AM PDT by fiscon1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fiscon1

Nothing worse than when you have terrorists within.


2 posted on 08/13/2009 10:25:34 AM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiscon1
"Homicide bomber" remains one of the silliest terms ever coined. It's pretty much a given that bombs kill, no?

When I read the term "homicide bomber" I assume they mean suicide bomber. I assume the bomber had bombs strapped on or something, and blew him or herself up.

If they want to distinguish between military bombers--who are killing but are not committing homicide, then they should say "Suicide bomber murders XX people". That way, we know the method used by the killer--suicide bombing--AND we know that that bomber was not a lawful combatant (as if a lawful combatant could lawfully carry out a suicide bombing.)

Homicide bomber is just a silly stupid worthless phrase. Tells you nothing---you just assume they mean the real term that they won't say for some silly reason.

3 posted on 08/13/2009 10:28:16 AM PDT by Huck ("He that lives on hope will die fasting"- Ben Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Agree completely; the term “homicide bomber” irritates me to no end every time I hear it.

Completely idiotic phrase. Can’t the news just use factually meaningful terms? Was it the work of a non-military civilian bomber? Fine, call them “terrorist bombers”. Were they Muslims? Call them “Muslim bombers”. Did they kill themselves in the attack? Then they’re “Muslim terrorist suicide bombers”.


4 posted on 08/13/2009 10:40:03 AM PDT by Zeddicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson