Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Blames Political Groups for Spam Emails on Health Care Bills
LifeNews.com ^ | August 17, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 08/17/2009 9:46:22 AM PDT by julieee

White House Blames Political Groups for Spam Emails on Health Care Bills

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- The White House is blaming political organizations like pro-life groups for the unsolicited emails people have ben receiving promoting the pro-abortion health care restructuring bill.

Thousands of people have emailed LifeNews.com and other media outlets complaining about the spam emails from the Obama administration.

http://www.lifenews.com/nat5361.html

(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; fishygate; flaggate; healthcarebill; ospama; spam; spamemails; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 08/17/2009 9:46:23 AM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee
“Spam”?? Really? Concerned citizens contacting their representatives = SPAM??
2 posted on 08/17/2009 9:49:27 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Stay together, pay the soldiers and forget everything else" Lucius Septimus Severus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

odumbo didnt inherit this from President Bush, shocked I tell you


3 posted on 08/17/2009 9:51:42 AM PDT by italianquaker (“Every inch of this Administration is rife with corruption and cronyism.” --- Michelle Malkin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee
"I inherited.

This spam operation.

From the previous.

Administration."

4 posted on 08/17/2009 9:51:45 AM PDT by clintonh8r ("Seems fishy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Yup... it is that pesky Brotherhood again... always fouling things up.


5 posted on 08/17/2009 9:52:19 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

I don’t think this would be such a flap, if so many people didn’t want to have anything do with ZerO.


6 posted on 08/17/2009 9:52:41 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Idiotcracy has arrived 400 years early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Other way round...

people using flag@whitehouse.gov were getting unsolicited emails from the WHITEHOUSE..

EVERYONE who got one should file complaint under the “ANTI-SPAM” acts ...

/sarc


7 posted on 08/17/2009 9:52:58 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - To Conservatives, a WARNING - to Liberals, a TEXTBOOK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Another day, another group of conservatives getting demonized in the never ending march for Socialistic power.


8 posted on 08/17/2009 9:55:11 AM PDT by FLAMING DEATH (Cash for Clunkers is proof that Obama is waging war on the poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Spam song:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8huXkSaL7o


9 posted on 08/17/2009 9:56:17 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Fili et Spiritus Sancti.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Our White House spammed? What the heck....is the security of our country being compromised by this inept administration?


10 posted on 08/17/2009 9:57:10 AM PDT by Paratrooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: julieee
wow. Now to subpoena the server and hard drives in order to make sure the White House didn't keep lists.. or destroy them. Bwahahahahahahahaha...

Oh , this is going to be sweet.

They can't collect lists or names... and now that they've obviously got them... they can't destroy them.

It's all against the law. So lets see who gets chunked under the SOUL Train...

I'm glad the Czar of the Internet was named ... or is it the IT Czar.... whatever. His/Her head will roll as will some other putz.

Little Presidential pardon and no blood, no foul. Neat. The dems get away with another felony. easy, greasy.

11 posted on 08/17/2009 9:59:02 AM PDT by erman (Outside of a dog, a book is man's best companion. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Did the emails come from the White House or not?

They’re saying that pro-life groups groups hijacked the White House’s email system and sent out spam from Axelrod?


12 posted on 08/17/2009 9:59:22 AM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

“In a statement released on Sunday night after Fox News challenged White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on the emails, spokesman Nick Shapiro blamed citizens groups saying that the Obama administration likely emailed people who signed petitions on issues, such as asking Obama to stop funding abortions.

“If an individual received the e-mail because someone else or a group signed them up or forwarded the email, we hope they were not too inconvenienced,” he said. “Further, we suggest that they unsubscribe from the list by clicking the link at the bottom of the e-mail or tell whomever forwarded it to them not to forward such information anymore.”

I’ll bet that behind this somewhere is ACORN or whatever they call it now.

More Lies form the Liar-In-Chief. They have no remorse, only regret that they get caught.


13 posted on 08/17/2009 10:00:24 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56
EVERYONE who got one should file complaint under the “ANTI-SPAM” acts ...

It won't do you any good. It has been determined that the CAN-SPAM Act only covers unsolicited COMMERCIAL e-mail, not political spam:

Political speech remains at the core of the First Amendment freedoms, and it is unlikely that federal or state lawmakers will challenge its protection. Although courts have approved regulation of analogous types of speech, such as commercial spam, prerecorded telephone messages, and unsolicited "snail mail," these are sufficiently distinct from political e-mail, providing little precedent for regulating political spam. Ultimately, political spam will probably be defined more by market effects than government regulation. E-mail, unlike television, radio, and print, offers political candidates an inexpensive channel to reach broad sections of the electorate. In an age when money defines political campaigns, e-mail helps liberate candidates from the stranglehold of wealthy special interest groups. If it proves to be effective, communicating over the Internet may level the playing field for under-funded candidates. Cynics argue that political spam remains legal because the offenders (i.e. politicians) are precisely the ones who make the law. Free speech is a precious freedom, though, and public consciousness of political issues is vital to a healthy democracy. Considering these values, any technology that facilitates free political discussion is worth protection.

Source (law school)


14 posted on 08/17/2009 10:00:43 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Obama: If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the Kitchen.


15 posted on 08/17/2009 10:02:21 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erman
They can't collect lists or names... and now that they've obviously got them... they can't destroy them.

Not legally, but I doubt that's much of a deterrent to this group. If they do keep them, there's always the Sandy Berger option down the road.

16 posted on 08/17/2009 10:04:42 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Yeah, that explains why that gal on Fox News this morning received email from the WH at her WORK address, which she had NEVER used for anything but work related activity in a job she’s only held for a few months! I don’t know what her ‘politics’ are, wonder if she was a victim of snitching...she has a right to know!


17 posted on 08/17/2009 10:04:47 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Sarah Palin supports a "path to citizenship" = AMNESTY for illegal aliens. .... DEMINT '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee
Who should be fired, Barry?
18 posted on 08/17/2009 10:05:34 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Yeah, politiccal groups like “Friends for Barack Obama for President 2008”.


19 posted on 08/17/2009 10:14:24 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Whenever a lib accuses normal people of something, you can bet your bippy that the lib is doing the same thing himself.


20 posted on 08/17/2009 10:25:08 AM PDT by Leftism is Mentally Deranged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson