Again, how do you know your eye pictures are in transition, and even if it is in transition, how do you know it is going from the simple to the complex? The same question applies to the genes. And further, how do you know that gene sequences in question do not reflect efficiencies connected with modular design? And, speaking of genes, DNA is a digital code, and digital codes have ONLY been observed being created by intelligent minds. Finally, you never answered my question about reading the article, nor have you explained how creatures with complex eyes appear suddenly in the fossil record, without evolutionary antecedents.
He did answer your questions. The refutation of the “eyes exploded onto the scene” notion is plain.
This is the problem I have with the, er, Evangelical Wing of the Intelligent Design crowd: all too often their arguments reveal a gross & willful misunderstanding of biology, evolution, and the fossil record. I share the basic philosophy, but the rush to “you’re WRONG!” is, as you insinuated, childish.