Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
So we have a system capable of delivering enough energy to destroy a missile in flight ....

WHY are we not using this as a nice, static, SPEED OF LIGHT anti-aircraft battery around extremely high value targets???

10 posted on 08/19/2009 7:16:46 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (1st Amendment or the 2nd .... let them choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Centurion2000

Excellent idea. If it can take out a missile 200 miles away it ought to be able to take out an enemy aircraft.

If they can flush a trillion down a rathole that nobody can account for, I think we can spare another billion for this thing.


12 posted on 08/19/2009 7:21:59 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Centurion2000
So we have a system capable of delivering enough energy to destroy a missile in flight ....

WHY are we not using this as a nice, static, SPEED OF LIGHT anti-aircraft battery around extremely high value targets???

Ummm, no logical thinking will be tolerated. This is the government we're talking about here. And a Marxist Obamanation of a government at that.

But I would like to think that there are those who wear the uniform, and believe the oath they took, to have thought along similar lines. And what ZerØ doesn't know, won't hurt us. Protecting the US of A is not on their agenda.

13 posted on 08/19/2009 7:25:59 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson