Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2009 4:43:08 AM PDT by AJMCQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: AJMCQ

I like the AKA title for the “ONE”.


2 posted on 08/25/2009 4:45:37 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility: An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
"The Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii
In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were four different ways to get an “original birth certificate” on record.
BC1. If the birth was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).

BC2. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then all that was required was that one of the parents send in a birth certificate to be filed. The birth certificate could be filed by mail. There appears to have been no requirement for the parent to actually physically appear before “the local registrar of the district.”
It would have been very easy for a relative to forge an absent parent’s signature to a form and mail it in.
In addition, if a claim was made that “neither parent of the newborn child whose birth is unattended as above provided is able to prepare a birth certificate, the local registrar shall secure the necessary information from any person having knowledge of the birth and prepare and file the certificate.” (Section 57-8&9)
.... there is and was no requirement for a physician or midwife to witness, state or report that the baby was born in Hawaii.

BC3. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by a physician or midwife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, a “Delayed Certificate” could be filed, which required that “a summary statement of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed filing or the alteration [of a file] shall be endorsed on the certificates”, which “evidence shall be kept in a special permanent file.”
The statute provided that “the probative value of a ‘delayed’ or ‘altered’ certificate shall be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official before whom the certificate is offered as evidence.” (See Section 57- 9, 18, 19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).”

BC4. If a child is born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued upon testimony of an adult (including the subject person [i.e. the birth child as an adult]) if the Office of the Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii, provided that the person had attained the age of one year.
(See Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961.)
In 1955 the “secretary of the Territory” was in charge of this procedure. In 1960 it was transferred to the Office of the Lieutenant Governor (“the lieutenant governor, or his secretary, or such other person as he may designate or appoint from his office” §338-41 [in 1961]).

In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of “original birth certificate”. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, “Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that the proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.”
In this way “state policies and procedures” accommodate even “children born out of State” (this is the actual language of Act 182) with an “original birth certificate on record.”

3 posted on 08/25/2009 4:46:52 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

Please check the link. I keep arriving on the main page, instead of the article page. Thanks!


4 posted on 08/25/2009 4:55:46 AM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

It was never a national question.


6 posted on 08/25/2009 4:58:23 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Socialist Conservatives: "'Big government is free because tax cuts pay for it'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

Our forefathers put that clause in the Constitution for just a time as this.


7 posted on 08/25/2009 4:59:13 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

10 posted on 08/25/2009 5:10:35 AM PDT by RoadKingSE (How do you know that the light at the end of the tunnel isn't a muzzle flash ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ
"Please check the link. I keep arriving on the main page, instead of the article page...."

aren't article posters supposed to check link to source article?!

13 posted on 08/25/2009 5:33:36 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

The last paragraph indicates that “he” claims dual citizenship. I assume the “he” is Obama. And it also says that this is illegal. So, if Obama himself claims dual citizenship and this is prohibited as far as becoming President, why is there need to even worry about the birth certificate itself? It seems like, if true, the case is all made right there, by his own admission.


14 posted on 08/25/2009 5:34:41 AM PDT by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ

At least the doctor appears to have her head screwed on right regarding healthcare.

http://www.starbulletin.com/editorials/guesteditorials/20090817_Complex_health_care_issue_deserves_closer_scrutiny.html


17 posted on 08/25/2009 5:52:59 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ
Where he was actually born is not known. What his actual citizenship was and is, although he claims he was a dual citizen, is also not known.


32 posted on 08/25/2009 7:10:57 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Extreme right-winged mob terrorist astroturfing bitter clinging racist birther evilmongering wingnut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ
It's news with views, an s:

http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter164.htm

Lynn a great writer. See her other articles on AKA at: http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuterA.htm

46 posted on 08/25/2009 12:25:33 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AJMCQ
"Do we know that Stanley Ann Dunham Obama was his mother? That Barack Hussein Obama was his father? What proof has been presented, beyond the claims of AKA and his worshippers, that he is even the child of these two people?"
47 posted on 08/25/2009 12:28:39 PM PDT by Art in Idaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Apple Blossom

ping


54 posted on 08/27/2009 5:03:59 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Socialism is not a bad word. It is a bad concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson