Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radiation tests are questioned (And so it begins...)
Boston Globe ^ | August 27, 2009 | Stephanie Desmon

Posted on 08/27/2009 11:32:43 AM PDT by Innovative

Skyrocketing numbers of expensive medical imaging procedures - from CT scans to nuclear stress tests - are not just straining the nation's health care system, but are exposing patients to significant amounts of potentially cancer-causing radiation even though little research has been done into whether those tests actually make people healthier, a new study suggests.

The tests, say the study's authors, may be doing more harm than good.

"One reason why these tests are being used more is they're getting better and better and they're an extremely helpful part of diagnosis and treatment," said Dr. Reza Fazel, a cardiologist at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta and the lead author of a study in today's New England Journal of Medicine. "But just because we have them doesn't mean we should use them. ... There's a cost with these tests, and it's not just dollars but radiation risk."

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: health; healthcare; kennedycare; medicine; obama; obamacare; rationing; socializedmedicine; tortreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
So it will be for our own good that they will deny people these tests...

Note the "potentially" -- there is no evidence that these test are harmful, they are just trying to provide justification with no evidence, to ration these test.

It will be much more cost effective to deny people the tests, that way severe diseases won't get discovered early, then they can say it's too late to treat them and look at all the money they will save by letting the patient just go away and die.

Why don't we just stop any high-tech medical care, give people two aspirings nnd they will either get better or die, in any case, look at all the money we can save on healthcare.

1 posted on 08/27/2009 11:32:44 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Look for taxpayer money going into healing crystals in the future.


2 posted on 08/27/2009 11:34:06 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

You get more radiation flying in a plane than an exposure during these tests.


3 posted on 08/27/2009 11:35:38 AM PDT by EBH (it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

But O says we need to do these preventative tests to uncover problems before they become expensive problems to fix.


4 posted on 08/27/2009 11:37:06 AM PDT by edcoil (If I had 1 cent for every dollar the government saved, Bill Gates and I would be friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
"Why don't we just stop any high-tech medical care, give people two aspirings nnd they will either get better or die, in any case, look at all the money we can save on healthcare. "

Exclude congress, and that's pretty much the plan.

Congressional attidude on Healthcare:


5 posted on 08/27/2009 11:37:36 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
"are not just straining the nation's health care system, but are exposing patients to significant amounts of potentially cancer-causing radiation"

Oh for crying out loud. This is pure fear mongering. So called 'radioactive iodine isotopes do not expose people to "significant amounts of radiation", and CT scans expose a person to about 2 years of the same radiation you get from the atmosphere.

6 posted on 08/27/2009 11:38:39 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

So here we go. Good medical care is actually bad for us. Those evil doctors are behind it. /s

The red pill or the blue pill is the healthcare, and you better answer that question properly or you are dead meat.


7 posted on 08/27/2009 11:39:27 AM PDT by dforest (Who is the real Jim Thompson? I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
So no CT scan because its to expensive but exploratory surgery for diagnosis is ok?
Scan vs surgery - hummmm I am thinking the scan is cheaper, but what do I know.
8 posted on 08/27/2009 11:39:49 AM PDT by svcw (Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

We need to start a list of medical treatments and/or medicines they are or are trying to take away:

The global warming goons really screwed over us asthmatics by forcing the change in the rescue inhalers, so now I guess when we get pneumonia due to the lack of medication from said inhalers, we’ll be denied the cat scans to see where/how bad the infection is.

Ain’t life great!


9 posted on 08/27/2009 11:40:35 AM PDT by Grumpybutt (Common Sense - where has it gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Personally, I’d rather take a little extra radiation prior to my surgery than end up with undiscovered, unremoved, bone shards floating around in my body. I know from personal experience that exploding tibias leave “shrapnel” behind.


10 posted on 08/27/2009 11:41:10 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“So no CT scan because its to expensive but exploratory surgery for diagnosis is ok?

Don’t worry, you are not going to get exploratory surgery under obamacare either.


11 posted on 08/27/2009 11:41:22 AM PDT by Innovative (Weakness is provocative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Related:

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/46425/title/Isotope_crisis_threatens_medical_care____

12 posted on 08/27/2009 11:41:44 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
I know it looks this way but I had an abdominal CT a year or so ago and the docs I work with were cautioning me then.

CT Scan Overuse May Up Cancer Risk Radiation From Scans May Affect Future Health

This is from November, 2007, for instance.

"In a new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers at the Columbia University Medical Center in New York estimate that CT scans could cause as much as 2 percent of all cancers in the United States in the next 20 to 30 years."

Really, as a general rule avoid anything except that first colonoscopy that you don't need. The more drugs you take, the more procedures you have, etc, the more risk you put into life.

Exercise, eat high fiber with lots of fruit and vegetables, and laugh as often as possible.

Just my two cents.

13 posted on 08/27/2009 11:42:22 AM PDT by MarMema (Marxism is never about truth, it is about power)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Obviously the debate is over and the science is settled. No more XRays or CT scans...

hh


14 posted on 08/27/2009 11:42:24 AM PDT by hoosier hick (Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo....Barry Goldwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"Look for taxpayer money going into healing crystals in the future."

Don't laugh. Holistic medicine/therapy is already getting some taxpayer dollars in Canada.

15 posted on 08/27/2009 11:42:35 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Just last week I moved 75% of the funds in my retirement account into healing crystals futures, so I should be in good shape.


16 posted on 08/27/2009 11:43:52 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

You know, the federal government of the usa is the ABSOLUTE LAST entity that I want trying to advise me or anyone else on how to save money. Got to be effing kidding me...


17 posted on 08/27/2009 11:44:07 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Good point.


18 posted on 08/27/2009 11:44:16 AM PDT by svcw (Legalism reinforces self-righteousness - it communicates to you the good news of your own goodness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

you KNOW this is TRUE!!!

how?

because you see millions of people who’ve availed themselves of said tests, hair falling out, dying in the streets every day!!!!!

oh...wait. that’s right, i don’t see evidence of their claim..............


19 posted on 08/27/2009 11:44:36 AM PDT by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
A Government Accountability Office report last year showed a 12 percent decline in imaging spending from $13.8 billion in 2006 to $12.1 billion in 2007. But over the same period, the use of CT scans and MRIs continued to rise.

Gee, you think that might be because the technology is improving? As long as there's a competitive marketplace for high-tech equipment, that equipment tends to get both better and cheaper as time goes on. To me, this is one of the most worrisome aspects of socialized medicine.
20 posted on 08/27/2009 11:45:59 AM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson